Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Investigation of the Optimum Baseline Blood Pressure for Spinal Anesthesia to Guide Vasopressor Management for Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Case-Control Design.
Kovacheva, Vesela P; Armero, William; Zhou, Guohai; Bishop, David; Dyer, Robert; Carvalho, Brendan.
Affiliation
  • Kovacheva VP; Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
  • Armero W; Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.
  • Zhou G; Center for Clinical Investigation, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.
  • Bishop D; Anaesthetics, Critical Care and Pain Management, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Scottsville, ZAF.
  • Dyer R; Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital Observatory, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, ZAF.
  • Carvalho B; Anesthesiology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Cureus ; 15(9): e45380, 2023 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37854732
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend prophylactic vasopressor administration during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery to maintain intraoperative blood pressure above 90% of the baseline value. We sought to determine the optimum baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) reading to guide the management of spinal hypotension. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of data collected from normotensive patients presenting for elective cesarean delivery in a tertiary care institution from October 2018 to August 2020. We compared the magnitude of hypotension in patients who reported nausea versus those who did not, using a case-control design. Baseline MAPs at last office visit, morning of surgery, or operating room (pre-spinal) were determined. We calculated the duration and degree of hypotension using the area under the curve (AUC) when the MAP of the respective patient was below 90% of each baseline. RESULTS: The patients who experienced nausea (n=45) had longer and more profound periods of hypotension than those who did not develop nausea (n=240). A comparison of AUC using MAP baseline at the last office visit or on the morning of surgery showed a statistically significant between-group difference, P=0.02, and P=0.005, respectively, and no significant between-group difference when 90% of the MAP baseline in the operating room was used. CONCLUSIONS: Patients had the highest preoperative MAP in the operating room and the AUC was similar for those with and without nausea when the pre-spinal MAP baseline was used. Therefore, maintaining higher intraoperative blood pressure using individual pre-spinal MAP as baseline should reduce intraoperative maternal nausea.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Cureus Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Cureus Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United States