Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Lower Revision Rates and Improved Stability With a Monoblock Ceramic Acetabular Cup.
Vercruysse, Loïc Y G; Milne, Lachlan P; Harries, Dylan T C; de Steiger, Richard N; Wall, Christopher J.
Affiliation
  • Vercruysse LYG; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia; Department of Development and Regeneration KU Leuven, Institute for Orthopaedic Research and Training KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Milne LP; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Harries DTC; Registry Science, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • de Steiger RN; Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Department of Surgery, Epworth Healthcare, University of Melbourne, Richmond, Victoria, Australia.
  • Wall CJ; Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Department of Orthopaedics, Toowoomba Hospital, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia; University of Queensland Rural Clinical School, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
J Arthroplasty ; 39(4): 985-990, 2024 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37871861
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Monoblock ceramic cups are designed to accommodate large-diameter femoral heads. This has the potential to offer the advantages of an increased range of motion and enhanced joint stability. These features could benefit younger and high-demand patients in need of total hip arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to assess the survival rate and the reasons for revision of the DeltaMotion cup.

METHODS:

Data from the AOANJRR were analyzed for all patients who had undergone a primary conventional THA performed between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2021. Only prostheses with ceramic/ceramic, ceramic/XLPE, metal/XLPE, or CM/XLPE bearing surfaces were included. The primary outcome measure was the cumulative percent revision for all causes. Secondary outcome measures were revision for dislocation/instability, ceramic breakage, or noise. A subanalysis for cup size was also performed.

RESULTS:

There were 486,946 primary conventional THA procedures undertaken for any reason. Of these, 4,033 used the DeltaMotion cup and 482,913 were modular designs. The DeltaMotion cup had the lowest CPR for all diagnoses compared to the modular bearings at all time points, had a significantly lower revision rate for prosthesis dislocation and no revisions for squeaking compared to other modular bearings. There were 175 ceramic breakages recorded in the modular bearing group and 1 ceramic breakage in the DeltaMotion group.

CONCLUSIONS:

The DeltaMotion cup had a low rate of all-cause revision, and for dislocation, ceramic breakage, and noise. Although this cup is no longer manufactured, ongoing follow-up of newer monoblock ceramic cups will determine their suitability for younger and more active patients.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Joint Dislocations / Hip Prosthesis Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Arthroplasty Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Belgium

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Joint Dislocations / Hip Prosthesis Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Arthroplasty Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Belgium