Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Midwives', obstetricians', and nurses' perspectives of humanised care during pregnancy and childbirth for women classified as high risk in high income countries: A mixed methods systematic review.
Curtin, Mary; Murphy, Margaret; Savage, Eileen; O'Driscoll, Michelle; Leahy-Warren, Patricia.
Affiliation
  • Curtin M; School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Murphy M; School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
  • Savage E; School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
  • O'Driscoll M; School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
  • Leahy-Warren P; School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
PLoS One ; 18(10): e0293007, 2023.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37878625
Women classified as 'high risk' or 'complicated' in pregnancy and childbirth have increased difficulty in accessing humanised care/humanisation in childbirth due to perceptions that this approach rejects the use of intervention and/or technology. Humanised care recognises the psychological and physical needs of women in pregnancy and birth. A mixed methods systematic review using a convergent segregated approach was undertaken using the Joanne Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. The objective of the review was to identify the presence of humanisation for women with high risk pregnancy and/or childbirth in high income countries. Studies were included if they measured humanisation and/or explored the perspectives of midwives, obstetricians, or nurses on humanisation for women classified as having a high-risk or complicated pregnancy or childbirth in a high income country. Qualitative data were analysed using a meta-aggregative approach and a narrative synthesis was completed for the quantitative data. All studies were assessed for their methodological quality using the MMAT tool. Four databases were searched, and nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1617 participants from nine countries were included. Three qualitative findings were synthesised, and a narrative synthesis of quantitative data was completed. The integration of qualitative and quantitative data identified complimentary findings on: (i) the importance of developing a harmonised relationship with women; (ii) increased time counselling women on their choices; and (iii) fear of professional reputational damage if caring outside of protocols. Negotiating with women outside of protocols may have a wider impact on the professional than first thought. Understanding how healthcare professionals individualise care for women at risk in labour requires further investigation.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Midwifery / Nurses Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Ireland Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Midwifery / Nurses Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Ireland Country of publication: United States