Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Public engagement with genomics.
Middleton, Anna; Adams, Avery; Aidid, Hugbaad; Atutornu, Jerome; Boraschi, Daniela; Borra, Julian; Bircan, Tuba; Burch, Claudette; Costa, Alessia; Dickinson, Anna; Enticknap, Ann; Galloway, Catherine; Gale, Francesca; Garlick, Emma; Haydon, Em; Henriques, Sasha; Mitchell, Marion; Milne, Richard; Monaghan, Jack; Morley, Katherine I; Muella Santos, Milena; Olivares Boldu, Laura; Olumogba, Fifi; Orviss, Kate; Parry, Vivienne; Patch, Christine; Robarts, Lauren; Shingles, Sam; Smidt, Cindy; Tomlin, Ben; Parkinson, Sarah.
Affiliation
  • Middleton A; Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
  • Adams A; Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK.
  • Aidid H; RAND Europe, Cambridge, England, UK.
  • Atutornu J; Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
  • Boraschi D; Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK.
  • Borra J; Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
  • Bircan T; Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK.
  • Burch C; School of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Suffolk, Ipswich, England, UK.
  • Costa A; Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK.
  • Dickinson A; The Thin Air Factory Ltd, London, England, UK.
  • Enticknap A; Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
  • Galloway C; Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK.
  • Gale F; Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK.
  • Garlick E; Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
  • Haydon E; Science and Technology, Onward, London, England, UK.
  • Henriques S; Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
  • Mitchell M; Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK.
  • Milne R; Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
  • Monaghan J; Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
  • Morley KI; Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
  • Muella Santos M; Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
  • Olivares Boldu L; Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK.
  • Olumogba F; Clinical Genetics Department, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, England, UK.
  • Orviss K; Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
  • Parry V; Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK.
  • Patch C; Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
  • Robarts L; Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK.
  • Shingles S; Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
  • Smidt C; RAND Europe, Cambridge, England, UK.
  • Tomlin B; Melbourne School of Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Parkinson S; Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
Wellcome Open Res ; 8: 310, 2023.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37928209
ABSTRACT
As detailed in its flagship report, Genome UK, the UK government recognises the vital role that broad public engagement across whole populations plays in the field of genomics. However, there is limited evidence about how to do this at scale. Most public audiences do not feel actively connected to science, are oftenunsure of the relevance to their lives and rarely talk to their family and friends about; we term this dis-connection a 'disengaged public audience'. We use a narrative review to explore (i) UK attitudes towards genetics and genomics and what may influence reluctance to engage with these topics; (ii) innovative public engagement approaches that have been used to bring diverse public audiences into conversations about the technology. Whilst we have found some novel engagement methods that have used participatory arts, film, social media and deliberative methods, there is no clear agreement on best practice. We did not find a consistently used, evidence-based strategy for delivering public engagement about genomics across diverse and broad populations, nor a specific method that is known to encourage engagement from groups that have historically felt (in terms of perception) and been (in reality) excluded from genomic research. We argue there is a need for well-defined, tailor-made engagement strategies that clearly articulate the audience, the purpose and the proposed impact of the engagement intervention. This needs to be coupled with robust evaluation frameworks to build the evidence-base for population-level engagement strategies.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Wellcome Open Res Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Wellcome Open Res Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom