Objections to assisted dying within institutions: systemic solutions for rapprochement.
BMC Med Ethics
; 24(1): 100, 2023 11 16.
Article
in En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-37974178
In this Matters Arising article, we outline how the recent article "The impact on patients of objections by institutions to assisted dying: a qualitative study of family caregivers' perceptions" (White et al., 2023 Mar 13;24(1):22) informed Voluntary Assisted Dying (VAD) implementation in our large Australian public health setting, where objections do not emanate from, but within, the institution. In reporting the harms to patients and caregivers created by institutional objection, White et al. provide an evidenced-based road map for potential potholes or risks associated with VAD implementation. We discuss the complexities emerging from the diverse views of health professionals and the ethical tensions arising from such, especially within certain specialties, and how we developed systemic strategies that support patients, caregivers and staff alike. We highlighted the need to shift from "Do you support VAD?" to "How can we support you as healthcare professionals to integrate VAD into your practice, in a way that complies with the legislation, meets the needs of patients and caregivers, and feels safe and does not compromise your moral stance?"
Key words
Full text:
1
Collection:
01-internacional
Database:
MEDLINE
Main subject:
Suicide, Assisted
Limits:
Humans
Country/Region as subject:
Oceania
Language:
En
Journal:
BMC Med Ethics
Journal subject:
ETICA
Year:
2023
Document type:
Article
Affiliation country:
Australia
Country of publication:
United kingdom