Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Engaging Premedical Students in Medical Education Research: Benefits of Clinical Skills Observation Studies.
Weingartner, Laura A; Noonan, Emily J; Shaw, M Ann; Fuselier, Linda.
Affiliation
  • Weingartner LA; L.A. Weingartner is assistant professor, undergraduate medical education, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky; ORCID: 0000-0003-0820-3980.
  • Noonan EJ; E.J. Noonan is assistant professor, undergraduate medical education, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky; ORCID: 0000-0002-7361-8229.
  • Shaw MA; M.A. Shaw is vice dean for undergraduate medical education, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky.
  • Fuselier L; L. Fuselier is chair and professor, Department of Biology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.
Acad Med ; 98(11S): S157-S164, 2023 11 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37983408
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Observations requiring evaluation and critical thinking can be powerful learning experiences. Video-recorded standardized patient encounters are underused resources for evaluation and research. The authors engaged premedical students in medical education research reviewing standardized patient encounters. This study aims to explore participant perceptions of the research experience and how they gained clinical skills.

METHOD:

This mixed-method study was completed between 2019 and 2022. Premedical participants coded medical students' clinical skills in video-recorded standardized patient encounters. Each participant also completed their own new patient history in a standardized patient encounter at both the beginning and end of their research project. Participants then completed an end-of-program debrief to discuss their experiences coding the clinical skills encounters. The authors coded communication skills implemented in the pre/postencounters and completed a thematic analysis of the debrief transcripts.

RESULTS:

All 21 participants demonstrated significant clinical skills gain after their research project, which included spending more time with the patient (pre-M=5 minutes, post-M=19 minutes, t=13.2, P<.001) and asking more questions (pre-M=13, post-M=40, t=9.3, P<.001). Prior clinical experience did not influence pre- or postoutcomes, but the number of videos coded was associated with asking more questions in the postencounter. Participants described learning actively and reflected that their clinical skills research project gave them greater insight into patient-care aspects of medical school and how medical students learn.

CONCLUSIONS:

These data demonstrate that observational studies in which premedical students evaluate standardized patient encounters gave the students context to medical education while enabling them to develop and transfer their own clinical skills. Studies observing standardized patient encounters provide rich insight into clinical skills development, and this work generates both research outcomes and actionable program evaluation data for medical educators. Purposefully engaging premedical students in such experiential learning opportunities benefits the students and helps cultivate early medical education pathways for these learners.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Students, Medical / Education, Medical Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Acad Med Journal subject: EDUCACAO Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Students, Medical / Education, Medical Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Acad Med Journal subject: EDUCACAO Year: 2023 Document type: Article