Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and Safety of Programmed Death-1 (PD-1)/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Hong, X; Zhang, Y; Chi, Z; Xu, Q; Lin, W; Huang, Y; Lin, T; Zhang, Y.
Affiliation
  • Hong X; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Urology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, PR China.
  • Zhang Y; Department of Urology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, PR China.
  • Chi Z; Department of Urology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, PR China.
  • Xu Q; Department of Urology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, PR China.
  • Lin W; Department of Urology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, PR China.
  • Huang Y; Department of Urology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, PR China.
  • Lin T; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China. Electronic address: lintx@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
  • Zhang Y; Department of Urology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, PR China. Electronic address: zhang_yonghai@126.com.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 36(1): e20-e30, 2024 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37993317
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library until 1 July 2022 for mCRPC trials testing PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors. We measured the efficacy and safety using overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rates (ORR), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate or treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). When possible, data were meta-analysed.

RESULTS:

Thirteen studies involving 2533 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.42-1.20, I2 = 80.3%, PHeterogeneity<0.001) and for PFS was 0.65 (95% confidence interval 0.38-0.92, I2 = 72.2%, PHeterogeneity = 0.013). Furthermore, better ORR (relative risk = 2.77, 95% confidence interval 1.25-6.13, I2 = 0%, PHeterogeneity = 0.699) was found in PD-L1-expressing tumours. However, no statistical trends between PD-L1 status on PSA response rate (relative risk = 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.5-1.25, I2 = 0%, PHeterogeneity = 0.953) and tumour mutational burden on ORR (relative risk = 2.53, 95% confidence interval 0.49-13.12, I2 = 74.5%, PHeterogeneity = 0.02) were observed. The pooled proportions of TRAEs and ≥ grade 3 TRAEs were 85.1% (95% confidence interval = 71.7-98.5%) and 31.6% (95% confidence interval = 18.9-44.4%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

This meta-analysis showed that among selected populations of men with mCRPC, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 combination treatment may significantly increase the PFS benefits. However, overall survival in mCRPC warrants further testing.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor / Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor / Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2024 Document type: Article