Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The evolving landscape of publishing in the field of pain: An automated bibliometric analysis from 1975 to 2020.
Arendt-Nielsen, L; Pedersen, J T; Dreier, S; Nielsen, T A; Høj, A L; Thomsen, L.
Affiliation
  • Arendt-Nielsen L; Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), SMI, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Pedersen JT; Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mech-Sense, Clinical Institute, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Dreier S; Steno Diabetes Center North Denmark, Clinical Institute, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Nielsen TA; Aalborg University Library, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Høj AL; Aalborg University Library, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Thomsen L; Department of Ophthalmology, Clinical Institute, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Eur J Pain ; 28(5): 729-740, 2024 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38009838
BACKGROUND: The aims of this bibliometric analysis were (1) a longitudinal analysis of the publication landscape in the field of pain (1975-2020) and (2) to characterize the overall publication profiles for two selected journals: European Journal of Pain and PAIN® utilizing an automated approach. METHODS: Database searches in Scopus extracted all journals with 'pain' in their title. For the two specific journals, papers were manually/automatically profiled into preclinical, human and translational studies. RESULTS: A gross list of 64 journals in the field of pain consisting of both active and ceased journals in Scopus were included in this analysis which identified 62,565 papers with approximately 4000 papers published/year. These papers include 2759 and 9156 papers in Eur. J. Pain and PAIN®, respectively. Currently, there are 24 active 'pain' journals. Authors/paper increase from 2 to 7 indicating a development from mono-disciplinary to multi-disciplinary studies. The overall publication profiles assessing preclinical, human (experimental/clinical) and translational papers in Eur. J. Pain and PAIN® were almost similar (14%, 75% and 10% versus 26%, 63% and 10%). Papers have changed over the years from mono-disciplinary studies (e.g. behavioural studies) to multi-disciplinary studies (e.g. combined behavioural and cell studies). After optimization, the search model matched the manual screening by 100%, 98% and 96% for the preclinical, clinical and healthy volunteer categories. CONCLUSIONS: Over the last 45 years, more than 60,000 pain-related papers have been published. Papers develop over the years from mono-disciplinary to multi-disciplinary studies. The overall publication profile including preclinical, human (experimental/clinical) and translational papers was almost similar in Eur. J. Pain and PAIN®. SIGNIFICANCE: The bibliometric analysis of a pain journal provides information on which specific areas of research are published, how this may have changed over the years and how a journal is positioned compared with other journals in the field.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Publishing / Bibliometrics Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Pain Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Denmark Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Publishing / Bibliometrics Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Pain Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Denmark Country of publication: United kingdom