Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Benchmarking usability of patient portals in Estonia, Finland, Norway, and Sweden.
Kujala, Sari; Simola, Saija; Wang, Bo; Soone, Hedvig; Hagström, Josefin; Bärkås, Annika; Hörhammer, Iiris; Cajander, Åsa; Johansen Fagerlund, Asbjørn; Kane, Bridget; Kharko, Anna; Kristiansen, Eli; Moll, Jonas; Rexphepi, Hanife; Hägglund, Maria; Johansen, Monika A.
Affiliation
  • Kujala S; Department of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland. Electronic address: sari.kujala@aalto.fi.
  • Simola S; Department of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
  • Wang B; Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
  • Soone H; E-Medicine Centre, Department of Health Technologies, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.
  • Hagström J; Participatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Medtech Science & Innovation Centre, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Bärkås A; Participatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Medtech Science & Innovation Centre, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Hörhammer I; Department of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
  • Cajander Å; Medtech Science & Innovation Centre, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Johansen Fagerlund A; Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
  • Kane B; Participatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Karlstad University Business School, Karlstad, Sweden.
  • Kharko A; Participatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Medtech Science & Innovation Centre, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden; Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
  • Kristiansen E; Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
  • Moll J; Center for Empirical Research on Information Systems, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
  • Rexphepi H; School of Informatics, University of Skövde, Sköve, Sweden.
  • Hägglund M; Participatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Johansen MA; Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Int J Med Inform ; 181: 105302, 2024 Jan.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38011806
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Poor usability is a barrier to widespread adoption of electronic health records (EHR). Providing good usability is especially challenging in the health care context, as there is a wide variety of patient users. Usability benchmarking is an approach for improving usability by evaluating and comparing the strength and weaknesses of systems. The main purpose of this study is to benchmark usability of patient portals across countries.

METHODS:

A mixed-methods survey approach was applied to benchmark the national patient portals offering patient access to EHR in Estonia, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. These Nordic countries have similar public healthcare systems, and they are pioneers in offering patients access to EHR for several years. In a survey of 29,334 patients, both patients' quantitative ratings of usability and their qualitative descriptions of very positive and very negative peak experiences of portal use were collected.

RESULTS:

The usability scores ranged from good to fair level of usability. The narratives of very positive and very negative experiences included the benefits of the patient portals and experienced usability issues. The regression analysis of results showed that very positive and negative experiences of patient portal use explain 19-35% of the variation of usability scores in the four countries. The percentage of patients who reported very positive or very negative experiences in each country was unrelated to the usability scores across countries.

CONCLUSIONS:

The survey approach could be used to evaluate usability with a wide variety of users and it supported learning from comparison across the countries. The combination of quantitative and qualitative data provided an approximation of the level of the perceived usability, and identified usability issues to be improved and useful features that patients appreciate. Further work is needed to improve the comparability of the varied samples across countries.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Portals Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Int J Med Inform Journal subject: INFORMATICA MEDICA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Ireland

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Portals Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Int J Med Inform Journal subject: INFORMATICA MEDICA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Ireland