Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using a multi-stakeholder co-design process to develop a health service organisation-wide patient reported outcome measure collection system.
Naude, Kim; Andrew, Nadine E; Srikanth, Velandai; Parker, Emily; Marsh, Lucy; Beare, Richard; McNaney, Roisin; Snowdon, David A.
Affiliation
  • Naude K; National Centre for Healthy Ageing, 2 Hastings Road, Frankston, VIC, Australia. kim.naude@monash.edu.
  • Andrew NE; Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia. kim.naude@monash.edu.
  • Srikanth V; National Centre for Healthy Ageing, 2 Hastings Road, Frankston, VIC, Australia.
  • Parker E; Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia.
  • Marsh L; Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Beare R; National Centre for Healthy Ageing, 2 Hastings Road, Frankston, VIC, Australia.
  • McNaney R; Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia.
  • Snowdon DA; Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Qual Life Res ; 33(3): 619-636, 2024 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38041742
PURPOSE: Limited examples exist of successful Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) implementation across an entire healthcare organisation. The aim of this study was to use a multi-stakeholder co-design process to develop a PROM collection system, which will inform implementation of routine collection of PROMs across an entire healthcare organisation. METHODS: Co-design comprised semi-structured interviews with clinicians (n = 11) and workshops/surveys with consumers (n = 320). The interview guide with clinicians focused on their experience using PROMs, preferences for using PROMs, and facilitators/barriers to using PROMs. Co-design activities specific to consumers focused on: (1) how PROMs will be administered (mode), (2) when PROMs will be administered (timing), (3) who will assist with PROMs collection, and (4) how long a PROM will take to complete. Data were analysed using a manifest qualitative content analysis approach. RESULTS: Core elements identified during the co-design process included: PROMs collection should be consumer-led and administered by someone other than a clinician; collection at discharge from the healthcare organisation and at 3-6 months post discharge would be most suitable for supporting comprehensive assessment; PROMs should be administered using a variety of modes to accommodate the diversity of consumer preferences, with electronic as the default; and the time taken to complete PROMs should be no longer than 5-10 min. CONCLUSION: This study provides new information on the co-design of a healthcare organisation-wide PROM collection system. Implementing a clinician and patient informed strategy for PROMs collection, that meets their preferences across multiple domains, should address known barriers to routine collection.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aftercare / Patient Reported Outcome Measures Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Qual Life Res Journal subject: REABILITACAO / TERAPEUTICA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aftercare / Patient Reported Outcome Measures Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Qual Life Res Journal subject: REABILITACAO / TERAPEUTICA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: Netherlands