Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tooth Wear Evaluation System 2.0-Evaluation of diagnostic reliability in the assessment of signs and symptoms for tooth wear by non-experts.
Roehl, Jakob C; Katzer, Lukasz; Jakstat, Holger A; Wetselaar, Peter; Ahlers, M Oliver.
Affiliation
  • Roehl JC; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
  • Katzer L; CMD-Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Jakstat HA; CMD-Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Wetselaar P; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Dental Materials and Special Care, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Ahlers MO; Department of General Oral Health Care, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Oral Rehabil ; 51(4): 712-723, 2024 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38087990
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Tooth wear is a multifactorial condition that manifests through various signs and symptoms. These individual signs and symptoms were described in multiple studies, leading to the inclusion in TWES 2.0 (Tooth Wear Evaluation System 2.0) and the forthcoming DC-TW (Diagnostic Criteria for Tooth Wear). However, a study evaluating their reliability has yet to be conducted.

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of the study was to examine the reliability in the assessment of 6 signs of pathological tooth wear and 18 clinical signs and symptoms determining aetiology, all of which are included in the TWES 2.0/DC-TW.

METHODS:

48 dental students (operators) evaluated patient cases from a patient pool of 14 patients on dental casts and high-resolution intraoral photographs. The agreement between all operators for each sign and symptom was calculated based on ICC (Intraclass Correlation Coefficients). Additionally, the agreement of each operator's evaluation with a predefined sample solution was calculated based on Cohen's kappa.

RESULTS:

Inter-user agreement ranged from near perfect (0.91) to poor (0.02) for the various pathology signs or aetiology symptoms of tooth wear (mean 0.32). The agreements of the operator's ratings compared to the sample solution resulted in Cohen's kappa from 0.18 to 1 (mean 0.59) for the pathology signs and ranged from 0.02 to 0.51 for the aetiology signs (mean 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS:

The reliability of the signs and symptoms examined and the ability of individual investigators to correctly identify and assign signs and symptoms varied widely. The current assessment tools for the qualification of tooth wear need further refinement, and examiners need intensive training in tooth wear assessment.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tooth Wear / Molar Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Oral Rehabil Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tooth Wear / Molar Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Oral Rehabil Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany