Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of Three Models for Prediction of Blood Transfusion during Cesarean Delivery Admission.
Bruno, Ann M; Federspiel, Jerome J; McGee, Paula; Pacheco, Luis D; Saade, George R; Parry, Samuel; Longo, Monica; Tita, Alan T N; Gyamfi-Bannerman, Cynthia; Chauhan, Suneet P; Einerson, Brett D; Rood, Kara; Rouse, Dwight J; Bailit, Jennifer; Grobman, William A; Simhan, Hyagriv N.
Affiliation
  • Bruno AM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Federspiel JJ; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
  • McGee P; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Pacheco LD; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
  • Saade GR; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
  • Parry S; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Longo M; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Tita ATN; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Gyamfi-Bannerman C; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Chauhan SP; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas.
  • Einerson BD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Rood K; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Rouse DJ; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
  • Bailit J; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The MetroHealth Medical System, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Grobman WA; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Simhan HN; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Am J Perinatol ; 41(S 01): e3391-e3400, 2024 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38134939
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Prediction of blood transfusion during delivery admission allows for clinical preparedness and risk mitigation. Although prediction models have been developed and adopted into practice, their external validation is limited. We aimed to evaluate the performance of three blood transfusion prediction models in a U.S. cohort of individuals undergoing cesarean delivery. STUDY

DESIGN:

This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial of tranexamic acid for prevention of hemorrhage at time of cesarean delivery. Three models were considered a categorical risk tool (California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative [CMQCC]) and two regression models (Ahmadzia et al and Albright et al). The primary outcome was intrapartum or postpartum red blood cell transfusion. The CMQCC algorithm was applied to the cohort with frequency of risk category (low, medium, high) and associated transfusion rates reported. For the regression models, the area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC) was calculated and a calibration curve plotted to evaluate each model's capacity to predict receipt of transfusion. The regression model outputs were statistically compared.

RESULTS:

Of 10,785 analyzed individuals, 3.9% received a red blood cell transfusion during delivery admission. The CMQCC risk tool categorized 1,970 (18.3%) individuals as low risk, 5,259 (48.8%) as medium risk, and 3,556 (33.0%) as high risk with corresponding transfusion rates of 2.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-2.9%), 2.2% (95% CI 1.8-2.6%), and 7.5% (95% CI 6.6-8.4%), respectively. The AUC for prediction of blood transfusion using the Ahmadzia and Albright models was 0.78 (95% CI 0.76-0.81) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.77-0.82), respectively (p = 0.38 for difference). Calibration curves demonstrated overall agreement between the predicted probability and observed likelihood of blood transfusion.

CONCLUSION:

Three models were externally validated for prediction of blood transfusion during cesarean delivery admission in this U.S. COHORT Overall, performance was moderate; model selection should be based on ease of application until a specific model with superior predictive ability is developed. KEY POINTS · A total of 3.9% of individuals received a blood transfusion during cesarean delivery admission.. · Three models used in clinical practice are externally valid for blood transfusion prediction.. · Institutional model selection should be based on ease of application until further research identifies the optimal approach..
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Blood Transfusion / Cesarean Section Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Am J Perinatol Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Blood Transfusion / Cesarean Section Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Am J Perinatol Year: 2024 Document type: Article
...