Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Social prescribing for children and young people with neurodisability and their families initiated in a hospital setting: a systematic review.
Gordon, Katie; Gordon, Laura; Basu, Anna Purna.
Affiliation
  • Gordon K; School of Psychology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.
  • Gordon L; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.
  • Basu AP; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK anna.basu@newcastle.ac.uk.
BMJ Open ; 13(12): e078097, 2023 12 21.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38135327
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Social prescribing (SP) is a non-medical intervention in which professionals refer patients to a link worker (LW), who connects them with appropriate support. Children and young people (CYP) with neurodisability often have unmet needs and may bypass community initiatives. We undertook a review of hospital-initiated SP for CYP with neurodisability.

DESIGN:

Systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidance and using Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. DATA SOURCES Medline, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science and FutureNHS, searched from 1 January 2000 to 19 October 2023, with no language restrictions. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Studies describing SP interventions for CYP (ages 0-25 years) with neurodisability/neurodivergence. EXCLUSIONS interventions outside of secondary care; with no description; or no LW. DATA EXTRACTION AND

SYNTHESIS:

Two researchers independently screened references. Data were charted, summarised, quality assessments performed and narratively reviewed.

RESULTS:

After removal of duplicates, 518 references were identified. Following screening, eight articles (covering five SP schemes) were included. Rahi et al connected 68 families of CYP newly diagnosed with visual impairment to a community LW. Families needed information about social and educational services, and emotional support. Healthcare professionals had more time for clinical issues. Six papers described three different digital interventions supporting in total 86 CYP with traumatic brain injury and their families. Wade et al (2004, 2005a, 2005b) provided a website with core and individualised sessions, and weekly therapist support. Wade et al (2018) provided a smartphone application, website and weekly meetings with an online coach. These interventions boosted social behaviours. Wade et al (2014, 2015) found that online family problem-solving therapy improved overall child functioning compared with self-guided resources. Toutain et al (2009) provided non-medical support to 11 children with fetal alcohol syndrome and their mothers. No outcome data were provided. Studies reported benefits to health, well-being, healthcare usage, knowledge, skills, satisfaction and service delivery.

CONCLUSION:

Literature describing hospital-initiated SP schemes for CYP with neurodisability, while sparse, suggests potential benefit. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022384188.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Personnel / Mothers Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2023 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Personnel / Mothers Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2023 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom