Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Pain in Women With Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Scoping Review.
Hoque, Sheymonti S; Ahern, Susannah; O'Connell, Helen E; Romero, Lorena; Ruseckaite, Rasa.
Affiliation
  • Hoque SS; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Ahern S; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • O'Connell HE; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Romero L; The Ian Potter Library, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Ruseckaite R; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
J Pain ; 25(6): 104454, 2024 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38142984
ABSTRACT
Women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) typically undergo surgery involving transvaginal mesh implants; however, transvaginal mesh surgery is associated with many adverse events including post-surgical pain. Assessment of pain as a symptom is necessary using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This scoping review aimed to describe and compare existing PROMs previously used to measure pain in women with PFDs. A scoping search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, Ovid PsycInfo, and grey literature was conducted. Studies published in English describing the development, implementation, and application of PFD-associated pain PROMs among adult women before and after pelvic floor surgery were included. From each article, a descriptive summary organised by study first author, publication year, country, setting, aim, study characteristics, and results were extracted. From 2,604 articles identified, 54 studies were included, describing 44 PROMs. Most studies described at least 2 to 3 instruments. The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 was most commonly described by 12 studies followed by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale. Of the 44 PROMs, 27 were condition-specific, of which 9 included items on pain; 17 generic PROMs, 4 of which contained items on pain; and 6 pain-specific PROMs. PROMs identified in our review measured pain not related to PFDs or pelvic floor surgery and quantified the pain experienced. These PROMs did not measure all areas of pain including region, sensation, impact, and triggers. The findings of this review will assist with developing a new pain-specific PROM in this population. PERSPECTIVE Women with pelvic floor disorders often undergo surgery involving transvaginal mesh, from which they experience debilitating pain. Pain is a major issue impacting women's lives. Patient-reported outcome measures can be used to assess the pain; however, it is unclear whether existing instruments are relevant.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pelvic Floor Disorders / Patient Reported Outcome Measures Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: J Pain Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pelvic Floor Disorders / Patient Reported Outcome Measures Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: J Pain Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: United States