Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Stability of peri-implantitis surgical reconstructive therapy-a (> 2 years) follow-up of a randomized clinical trial.
Wang, Chin-Wei; Di Gianfilippo, Riccardo; Kaciroti, Niko; Ou, Alice; Feng, Sheng-Wei; Wang, Hom-Lay.
Affiliation
  • Wang CW; Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. jeffwa@tmu.edu.tw.
  • Di Gianfilippo R; School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. jeffwa@tmu.edu.tw.
  • Kaciroti N; Department of Dentistry, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. jeffwa@tmu.edu.tw.
  • Ou A; Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Feng SW; Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Wang HL; Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Clin Oral Investig ; 28(1): 30, 2023 Dec 26.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38147180
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

This follow-up study aimed to report the 24- and 30-month outcomes of a cohort previously enrolled in a randomized clinical trial on surgical reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis.

METHODS:

Twenty-four patients were diagnosed with peri-implantitis and treated with surgical reconstructive therapy with or without the adjunctive use of ErYAG laser. Within-group and between-group comparisons were tested with mixed model with repeated measures.

RESULTS:

Regarding peri-implant pocket depth (PPD) reduction (control vs. laser test group) between 6 months (- 1.85 vs. - 2.65 mm) and 30 months (- 1.84 vs. - 3.04 mm), the laser group showed statistically significant changes but not the control group. In terms of radiographic marginal bone loss (RMBL) at 6 months (- 1.1 vs. - 1.46 mm) to 24 months (- 1.96 vs. - 2.82 mm), both groups showed statistical difference compared to baseline. The six explanted implants all were featured by severe peri-implantitis and mostly with no or limited keratinized tissue (< 2 mm) at baseline and membrane exposure after surgery. Among the 15 retained cases, eight cases achieved more than 50% peri-implant bone level gain.

CONCLUSIONS:

Within the limitation and follow-up time frame of this trial, the outcome of the surgical reconstructive therapy sustained or improved in most of the cases. However, 25% of the implants with severe peri-implantitis failed 2 years after the surgical reconstructive therapy. The use of ErYAG laser favors PPD reduction in the longer term up to 30 months. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Longer-term follow-up on reconstructive therapy of peri-implantitis revealed sustained or improved stability in certain cases, but the survival of implants with severe peri-implantitis has its limitation, especially when there is limited keratinized tissue (< 2 mm or no KT). TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials Registration Number NCT03127228 and HUM00160290.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Plastic Surgery Procedures / Peri-Implantitis Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Oral Investig Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Plastic Surgery Procedures / Peri-Implantitis Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Oral Investig Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Germany