Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Inverted U-Shaped relationship between team size and citation impact: Mediating role of responsibility diffusion.
Gan, Yetong; Liu, Jialin; Zhao, Yixuan; Zhu, Mengxiao; Wang, Gaofeng.
Affiliation
  • Gan Y; School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
  • Liu J; School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
  • Zhao Y; School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
  • Zhu M; School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
  • Wang G; School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Account Res ; : 1-21, 2024 Jan 02.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38164053
ABSTRACT
Despite the increasing prominence of research collaboration, a growing number of studies have confirmed that increasing team size can have limited performance benefits. However, the mechanism of this phenomenon has yet to be established. This study, therefore, quantified responsibility diffusion based on author contribution information and explored its mediating role in the relationship between collaboration size and citation impact (citation count in a four-year window). The results show the following (1) An inverted U-shaped relationship exists between team size and citation count. (2) Responsibility diffusion plays a partial mediating role between team size and citation count. (3) As team size increases, the degree of responsibility diffusion increases. Lastly, (4) responsibility diffusion has an inverted U-shaped curvilinear relationship with citation count (e.g., a moderate degree of responsibility diffusion has the highest impact). These findings offer a new understanding of the mechanism by which collaboration size influences research performance. This study also has practical implications for solving research collaboration dilemmas based on a group-cognition perspective.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Account Res Journal subject: ETICA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Account Res Journal subject: ETICA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China Country of publication: United States