Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the Vmaxpro sensor for assessing movement velocity and load-velocity variables: accuracy and implications for practical use.
Dragutinovic, Boris; Jacobs, Mats W; Feuerbacher, Joshua F; Goldmann, Jan-Peter; Cheng, Sulin; Schumann, Moritz.
Affiliation
  • Dragutinovic B; Department of Molecular and Cellular Sports Medicine, Institute of Cardiovascular Research and Sports Medicine, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany.
  • Jacobs MW; Department of Molecular and Cellular Sports Medicine, Institute of Cardiovascular Research and Sports Medicine, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany.
  • Feuerbacher JF; Department of Molecular and Cellular Sports Medicine, Institute of Cardiovascular Research and Sports Medicine, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany.
  • Goldmann JP; Institute of Biomechanics and Orthopaedics, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Cheng S; German Research Centre of Elite Sport Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Schumann M; Department of Physical Education, Exercise, Health and Technology Centre, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Biol Sport ; 41(1): 41-51, 2024 Jan.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38188099
ABSTRACT
We investigated the ecological validity of an inertial measurement unit (IMU) (Vmaxpro) to assess the movement velocity (MV) during a 1-repetition maximum (1RM) test and for the prediction of load-velocity (L-V) variables, as well as the ecological intra- day and inter-day reliability during free-weight bench press (BP) and squat (SQ). Furthermore, we provide recommendations for the practical use of the sensor. Twenty-three strength-trained men completed an incremental 1RM test, whereas seventeen men further participated in another 3 sessions consisting of 3 repetitions with 4 different loads (30, 50, 70 and 90% of 1RM) to assess validity and intra- and inter-day reliability, respectively. The MV was assessed using the Vmaxpro and a 3D motion capture system (MoCap). L-V variables and the 1RM were calculated based on submaximal velocities. The Vmaxpro showed high validity during the 1RM test for BP (r = 0.935) and SQ (r = 0.900), but with decreasing validity at lower MVs. The L-V variables and the 1RM demonstrated high validity for BP (r = 0.808-0.942) and SQ (r = 0.615-0.741) with a systematic overestimation. Coefficients of variance for intra- and inter-day reliability ranged from 2.4% to 9.7% and from 3.2% to 8.6% for BP and SQ, respectively. The Vmaxpro appears valid at high and moderately valid at low MVs. Depending on the required degree of accuracy, the sensor may be sufficient for the prediction of L-V variables and the 1RM. Our data indicate the sensor to be suitable for monitoring changes in MVs within and between training sessions.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Biol Sport Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany Country of publication: Poland

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Biol Sport Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany Country of publication: Poland