Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Etomidate versus Ketamine as Prehospital Induction Agent in Patients with Suspected Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.
Mansvelder, Floor J; Bossers, Sebastiaan M; Loer, Stephan A; Bloemers, Frank W; Van Lieshout, Esther M M; Den Hartog, Dennis; Hoogerwerf, Nico; van der Naalt, Joukje; Absalom, Anthony R; Peerdeman, Saskia M; Bulte, Carolien S E; Schwarte, Lothar A; Schober, Patrick.
Affiliation
  • Mansvelder FJ; Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Bossers SM; Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Loer SA; Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Bloemers FW; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Van Lieshout EMM; Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Den Hartog D; Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Hoogerwerf N; Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; and Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Lifeliner 3, Volkel, The Netherlands.
  • van der Naalt J; Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Absalom AR; Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Peerdeman SM; Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Bulte CSE; Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Lifeliner 1, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Schwarte LA; Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Lifeliner 1, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Schober P; Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Lifeliner 1, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Anesthesiology ; 140(4): 742-751, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38190220
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Severe traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among young people around the world. Prehospital care focuses on the prevention and treatment of secondary brain injury and commonly includes tracheal intubation after induction of general anesthesia. The choice of induction agent in this setting is controversial. This study therefore investigated the association between the chosen induction medication etomidate versus S(+)-ketamine and the 30-day mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury who received prehospital airway management in the Netherlands.

METHODS:

This study is a retrospective analysis of the prospectively collected observational data of the Brain Injury Prehospital Registry of Outcomes, Treatments and Epidemiology of Cerebral Trauma (BRAIN-PROTECT) cohort study. Patients with suspected severe traumatic brain injury who were transported to a participating trauma center and who received etomidate or S(+)-ketamine for prehospital induction of anesthesia for advanced airway management were included. Statistical analyses were performed with multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis.

RESULTS:

In total, 1,457 patients were eligible for analysis. No significant association between the administered induction medication and 30-day mortality was observed in unadjusted analyses (32.9% mortality for etomidate versus 33.8% mortality for S(+)-ketamine; P = 0.716; odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.32; P = 0.711), as well as after adjustment for potential confounders (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.73; P = 0.765; and risk difference 0.017; 95% CI, -0.051 to 0.084; P = 0.686). Likewise, in planned subgroup analyses for patients with confirmed traumatic brain injury and patients with isolated traumatic brain injury, no significant differences were found. Consistent results were found after multiple imputations of missing data.

CONCLUSIONS:

The analysis found no evidence for an association between the use of etomidate or S(+)-ketamine as an anesthetic agent for intubation in patients with traumatic brain injury and mortality after 30 days in the prehospital setting, suggesting that the choice of induction agent may not influence the patient mortality rate in this population.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Brain Injuries / Emergency Medical Services / Etomidate / Brain Injuries, Traumatic / Ketamine Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Humans Language: En Journal: Anesthesiology Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Brain Injuries / Emergency Medical Services / Etomidate / Brain Injuries, Traumatic / Ketamine Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Humans Language: En Journal: Anesthesiology Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands