Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of an E-learning resource on endoscopists' proximal serrated polyp detection rate: a randomized controlled trial.
van Toledo, David E F W M; IJspeert, Joep E G; Bleijenberg, Arne G C; Depla, Anne; Montazeri, Nahid S M; Dekker, Evelien.
Affiliation
  • van Toledo DEFWM; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • IJspeert JEG; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Bleijenberg AGC; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Depla A; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Montazeri NSM; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Dekker E; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Endoscopy ; 56(6): 412-420, 2024 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38191001
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Recent studies demonstrated that a higher proximal serrated polyp detection rate (PSPDR) among endoscopists is associated with a lower risk of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) incidence and death for their patients. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of an e-learning resource on PSPDR.

METHODS:

We performed a multicenter randomized controlled trial within the Dutch fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopists were randomized using block randomization per center to either receive a 60-minute e-learning resource on serrated polyp detection or not. PSPDR was calculated based on all colonoscopies performed during a 27-month pre-intervention and a 17-month post-intervention period. The primary end point was difference in PSPDR between intervention and control arms (intention to treat) using mixed effect logistic regression modeling, with time (pre-intervention/post-intervention) and interaction between time and arm (intervention/control) as fixed effects, and endoscopists as random effects.

RESULTS:

116 endoscopists (57 intervention, 59 controls) were included, and performed 27494 and 33888 colonoscopies, respectively. Median PSPDR pre-intervention was 13.6% (95%CI 13.0-14.1) in the intervention arm and 13.8% (95%CI 13.3-14.3) in controls. Post-intervention PSPDR was significantly higher over time in the intervention arm than in controls (17.1% vs. 15.4%, P=0.01).

CONCLUSION:

In an era of increased awareness and increasing PSPDRs, endoscopists who undertook a one-time e-learning course significantly accelerated the increase in PSPDR compared with endoscopists who did not undertake the e-learning. Widespread implementation might reduce PCCRC incidence.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colonic Polyps / Colonoscopy Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Endoscopy Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colonic Polyps / Colonoscopy Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Endoscopy Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands