Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Wrist Arthroplasty and Total Wrist Fusion: A Prospective Cohort Study with 2-Year Follow-up.
Clementson, Martin; Larsson, Sara; Abramo, Antonio; Brogren, Elisabeth.
Affiliation
  • Clementson M; Department of Hand Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Larsson S; Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Abramo A; Department of Hand Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Brogren E; Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38196851
ABSTRACT

Background:

The functional benefits of total wrist arthroplasty (TWA) over total wrist fusion (TWF) are unknown. The purpose of this prospective cohort study was to compare TWA and TWF with respect to functional outcomes and activity limitations at up to 2 years postoperatively.

Methods:

Between 2015 and 2020, we enrolled all adult patients undergoing TWA or TWF for the management of symptomatic end-stage wrist arthritis at 1 hand surgery department. The primary outcome was the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE). The secondary outcomes were the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at rest, on motion, and on loading; grip strength; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH); and range of motion. Patients completed questionnaires and were examined by the same physiotherapist at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Mixed-model analyses adjusting for age, diagnosis, the preoperative value of the dependent variable, and time since surgery were performed to compare differences in PRWE scores, VAS pain scores, and grip strength between TWA and TWF.

Results:

Of the 51 patients who had been included at baseline, 47 (18 in the TWA group and 29 in the TWF group) responded to questionnaires and underwent examinations at up to 2 years postoperatively. At baseline, the 2 groups did not differ in terms of age, sex, diagnosis (inflammatory or noninflammatory arthritis), PRWE score, VAS pain score, grip strength, DASH score, or range of motion. No differences between the groups were found for the PRWE (ß, -0.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], -14 to 13; p = 0.99), VAS pain at rest (ß, -3.3; 95% CI, -15 to 9; p = 0.58), VAS pain on loading (ß, -5.3; 95% CI, -22 to 11; p = 0.52), or grip strength (ß, -0.02; 95% CI, -0.18 to 0.14; p = 0.80) on the adjusted mixed-model analyses.

Conclusions:

Among patients with symptomatic end-stage wrist arthritis, those who underwent TWA did not demonstrate short-term outcomes, including patient-reported disability, pain, and grip strength, superior to those of patients who underwent TWF. These findings call into question the widespread use of TWA. Level of Evidence Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Language: En Journal: JB JS Open Access Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Sweden Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Language: En Journal: JB JS Open Access Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Sweden Country of publication: United States