Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical Significance and Prognostic Implications of Discontinuous Growth Pattern in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Study.
Kmeid, Michel; Lee, Goo; Yang, Zhaohai; Pacheco, Richard; Lin, Jingmei; Patil, Deepa T; Youssef, Mariam; Zhang, Qingzhao; Alkashash, Ahmad Mahmoud; Li, Jingwei; Lee, Hwajeong.
Affiliation
  • Kmeid M; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY.
  • Lee G; Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL.
  • Yang Z; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Pacheco R; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY.
  • Lin J; Pathology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Patil DT; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Youssef M; Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL.
  • Zhang Q; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Alkashash AM; Pathology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Li J; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Lee H; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY.
Am J Surg Pathol ; 48(4): 447-457, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38238961
ABSTRACT
The significance of discontinuous growth (DG) of the tumor to include tumor deposits and intramural metastasis in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is unclear. Esophagectomy specimens from 151 treatment-naïve and 121 treated patients with EAC were reviewed. DG was defined as discrete (≥2 mm away) tumor foci identified at the periphery of the main tumor in the submucosa, muscularis propria, and/or periadventitial tissue. Patients' demographics, clinicopathologic parameters, and oncologic outcomes were compared between tumors with DG versus without DG. DGs were identified in 16% of treatment-naïve and 29% of treated cases ( P =0.01). Age, gender, and tumor location were comparable in DG+ and DG- groups. For the treatment-naïve group, DG+ tumors were larger with higher tumor grade and stage and more frequent extranodal extension, lymphovascular/perineural invasion, and positive margin. Patients with treated tumors presented at higher disease stages with higher rates of recurrence and metastasis compared with treatment-naïve patients. In this group, DG was also associated with TNM stage and more frequent lymphovascular/perineural spread and positive margin, but not with tumor size, grade, or extranodal extension. In multivariate analysis, in all patients adjusted for tumor size, lymphovascular involvement, margin, T and N stage, metastasis, neoadjuvant therapy status, treatment year, and DG, DG was found to be an independent adverse predictor of survival outcomes in EAC. DG in EAC is associated with adverse clinicopathologic features and worse patient outcomes. DG should be considered throughout the entire clinicopathologic evaluation of treatment-naïve and treated tumors as well as in future staging systems.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Esophageal Neoplasms / Adenocarcinoma Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Esophageal Neoplasms / Adenocarcinoma Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Year: 2024 Document type: Article