Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluating minority representation across health care settings in hidradenitis suppurativa and psoriasis.
Greif, Charlotte; Gibson, Ruby S; Kimball, Alexa B; Holcomb, Zachary E; Porter, Martina L.
Affiliation
  • Greif C; Preliminary Internal Medicine Program, Internal Medicine Department, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
  • Gibson RS; Tulane Dermatology Program, Dermatology Department, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
  • Kimball AB; Dermatology Department, Harvard Medical School, Clinical Laboratory for Epidemiology and Applied Research in Skin, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Holcomb ZE; Department of Dermatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Porter ML; Department of Medicine, Carilion Clinic, Section of Dermatology, Roanoke, Virginia.
Int J Womens Dermatol ; 10(1): e129, 2024 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38240009
ABSTRACT

Background:

Females and minorities have been underrepresented in clinical research despite legislative efforts, including in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) and psoriasis (PsO) clinical trials.

Objective:

To identify differences in demographic breakdowns of HS and PsO patients between health care settings to uncover any causative health disparities.

Methods:

This study reports racial, ethnic, and sex of HS and PsO patient populations across the emergency department (ED), inpatient, clinical trial, and registry settings. In addition, 95% confidence intervals are used as proxies of statistical significance to compare demographics between settings.

Results:

Female, Hispanic, and Black patients were underrepresented in HS clinical trials compared to their population prevalence (female 63.7% vs 73.5%; Hispanic 3.8% vs 12.0%; Black 9.1% vs 20.3%). Female and Black patients were underrepresented in PsO trials compared to their population prevalence (female 33.0% vs 54.8%; Black 2.2% vs 5.7%). Black patients were overrepresented in the inpatient and ED settings in HS (inpatient vs ED vs population prevalence 49.9% vs 49.9% vs 20.3%) and in the inpatient setting in PsO (inpatient vs population prevalence 19.8% vs 5.7%).

Limitations:

The main limitation is the reliability and generalizability of the published studies used to compare demographics across settings.

Conclusion:

Underrepresentation of females and minorities in HS and PsO clinical trials is consistent with published literature. Overrepresentation of Black patients in acute care settings is likely multifactorial.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Equity_inequality Language: En Journal: Int J Womens Dermatol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Equity_inequality Language: En Journal: Int J Womens Dermatol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States