Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of type of emission and masking sound, and their spatial correspondence, on blind and sighted people's ability to echolocate.
Thaler, L; Castillo-Serrano, J G; Kish, D; Norman, L J.
Affiliation
  • Thaler L; Department of Psychology, Durham University, South Road, Durham, DH1 5AY, UK. Electronic address: lore.thaler@durham.ac.uk.
  • Castillo-Serrano JG; Department of Psychology, Durham University, South Road, Durham, DH1 5AY, UK.
  • Kish D; World Access for the Blind, 1007 Marino Drive, Placentia, CA, 92870, USA.
  • Norman LJ; Department of Psychology, Durham University, South Road, Durham, DH1 5AY, UK.
Neuropsychologia ; 196: 108822, 2024 04 15.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38342179
ABSTRACT
Ambient sound can mask acoustic signals. The current study addressed how echolocation in people is affected by masking sound, and the role played by type of sound and spatial (i.e. binaural) similarity. We also investigated the role played by blindness and long-term experience with echolocation, by testing echolocation experts, as well as blind and sighted people new to echolocation. Results were obtained in two echolocation tasks where participants listened to binaural recordings of echolocation and masking sounds, and either localized echoes in azimuth or discriminated echo audibility. Echolocation and masking sounds could be either clicks or broad band noise. An adaptive staircase method was used to adjust signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) based on participants' responses. When target and masker had the same binaural cues (i.e. both were monoaural sounds), people performed better (i.e. had lower SNRs) when target and masker used different types of sound (e.g. clicks in noise-masker or noise in clicks-masker), as compared to when target and masker used the same type of sound (e.g. clicks in click-, or noise in noise-masker). A very different pattern of results was observed when masker and target differed in their binaural cues, in which case people always performed better when clicks were the masker, regardless of type of emission used. Further, direct comparison between conditions with and without binaural difference revealed binaural release from masking only when clicks were used as emissions and masker, but not otherwise (i.e. when noise was used as masker or emission). This suggests that echolocation with clicks or noise may differ in their sensitivity to binaural cues. We observed the same pattern of results for echolocation experts, and blind and sighted people new to echolocation, suggesting a limited role played by long-term experience or blindness. In addition to generating novel predictions for future work, the findings also inform instruction in echolocation for people who are blind or sighted.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sound Localization Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Animals / Humans Language: En Journal: Neuropsychologia Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sound Localization Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Animals / Humans Language: En Journal: Neuropsychologia Year: 2024 Document type: Article