Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implementation of the ASCENT Trial to Improve Transplant Waitlisting Access.
Urbanski, Megan; Lee, Yi-Ting Hana; Escoffery, Cam; Buford, Jade; Plantinga, Laura; Pastan, Stephen O; Hamoda, Reem; Blythe, Emma; Patzer, Rachel E.
Affiliation
  • Urbanski M; Division of Transplantation, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Lee YH; Health Services Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Escoffery C; Division of Transplantation, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Buford J; Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Plantinga L; Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Pastan SO; University of California San Francisco, Department of Medicine, Divisions of Rheumatology and Nephology, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Hamoda R; Division of Transplantation, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Blythe E; Division of Transplantation, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Patzer RE; Health Services Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Kidney Int Rep ; 9(2): 225-238, 2024 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38344743
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

The Allocation System for changes in Equity in Kidney Transplantation (ASCENT) study was a hybrid type 1 trial of a multicomponent intervention among 655 US dialysis facilities with low kidney transplant waitlisting to educate staff and patients about kidney allocation system (KAS) changes and increase access to and reduce racial disparities in waitlisting. Intervention components included a staff webinar, patient and staff educational videos, and facility-specific feedback reports.

Methods:

Implementation outcomes were assessed using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance Framework. Postimplementation surveys were administered among intervention group facilities (n = 334); interviews were conducted with facility staff (n = 6). High implementation was defined as using 3 to 4 intervention components, low implementation as using 1 to 2 components, and nonimplementation as using no components.

Results:

A total of 331 (99%) facilities completed the survey; 57% were high implementers, 31% were low implementers, and 12% were nonimplementers. Waitlisting events were higher or similar among high versus low implementer facilities for incident and prevalent populations; for Black incident patients, the mean proportion waitlisted in low implementer facilities was 0.80% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.87) at baseline and 0.55% at 1-year (95% CI 0.48-0.62) versus 0.83% (95% CI 0.78-0.88) at baseline and 1.40% at 1-year (95% CI 1.35-1.45) in high implementer facilities. Interviews revealed that the intervention helped facilities prioritize transplant education, but that intervention components were not uniformly shared.

Conclusion:

The findings provide important context to interpret ASCENT effectiveness results and identified key barriers and facilitators to consider for future modification and scale-up of multilevel, multicomponent interventions in dialysis settings.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Kidney Int Rep Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Kidney Int Rep Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States