Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative Analysis of Three Nickel-Titanium Rotary Files in Severely Curved L-Shaped Root Canals: Preparation Time, Aberrations, and Fracture Rates.
Almnea, Raid Abdullah; Mohammad Al Ageel Albeaji, Sadun; Ali Alelyani, Ahmed; AlHarith, Dalia; Saeed Alshahrani, Abdulmajeed; Al Malwi, Ahmed Abdullah; Alobaid, Mohammed A; Al Moaleem, Mohammed M.
Affiliation
  • Almnea RA; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Division of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
  • Mohammad Al Ageel Albeaji S; Consultant Endodontics, Dental Center, Hafar al Batin, Saudi Arabia.
  • Ali Alelyani A; Restorative Department, Endodontic Division, College of Dentistry, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
  • AlHarith D; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Saeed Alshahrani A; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Division of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
  • Al Malwi AA; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Division of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
  • Alobaid MA; Restorative Dental Science Department & Department of Dental Education, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
  • Al Moaleem MM; Department of Prosthetic Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, 45142, Saudi Arabia.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38384359
ABSTRACT

Background:

This simulated study of 30 severely curved L-shaped root canals aimed to compare preparation time, aberrations, width measurements, and fractured files of three nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) files, namely, ProTaper, ProTaper Next (PTN), and WaveOne (WO).

Methods:

Thirty simulated L-curved root canals of resin blocks were randomly divided into three groups. The canals were prepared to a tip size of 25 using ProTaper, PTN, and WO rotary file systems. Pre- and post-operative views for each sample were captured by a professional camera at a standardized distance and position. Blue India ink was injected into the pre-operative canals, and red India ink was injected into the post-operative canals to give a clear superimposition image. Five points were assessed through the halfway of the canal to the orifice (area between the beginning of curvature and apical end point). Preparation time, aberrations, width measurements, and fractured files were recorded and analyzed.

Results:

Mean preparation time was longest in ProTaper (4.89±0.68 minutes). PTN and WO were the fastest in preparing the canals (about 3 minutes). A statistically significant difference was found between WO and ProTaper & PTN and ProTaper (p=0.000), while the difference was non-significant (p > 0.05) between WO and PTN. Nine aberrations consisting of three zips, one ledge and one outer widening were related to ProTaper, while WO recorded a ledge and fractured file, but for PTN system, it verified an outer widening and ledge. Only one WO file fractured, with no deformation observed in the other instruments. No significance was recorded among the width measurements in the different levels.

Conclusion:

ProTaper next achieved faster cutting than the ProTaper and WO file systems. PTN maintained the best apical termination position and produced the least canal aberration, followed by WO and ProTaper.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Clin Cosmet Investig Dent Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Saudi Arabia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Clin Cosmet Investig Dent Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Saudi Arabia