Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Different Effect Sizes of Motor Skill Training Combined with Repetitive Transcranial versus Trans-Spinal Magnetic Stimulation in Healthy Subjects.
Hamzei, Farsin; Ritter, Alexander; Pohl, Kristin; Stäps, Peggy; Wieduwild, Eric.
Affiliation
  • Hamzei F; Section of Neurological Rehabilitation, Hans-Berger-Hospital of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany.
  • Ritter A; Department of Neurology, Moritz Klinik, Hermann-Sachse-Straße 46, 07639 Bad Klosterlausnitz, Germany.
  • Pohl K; Section of Neurological Rehabilitation, Hans-Berger-Hospital of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany.
  • Stäps P; Section of Neurological Rehabilitation, Hans-Berger-Hospital of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany.
  • Wieduwild E; Department of Neurology, Moritz Klinik, Hermann-Sachse-Straße 46, 07639 Bad Klosterlausnitz, Germany.
Brain Sci ; 14(2)2024 Feb 06.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38391739
ABSTRACT
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is used to enhance motor training (MT) performance. The use of rTMS is limited under certain conditions, such as after a stroke with severe damage to the corticospinal tract. This raises the question as to whether repetitive trans-spinal magnetic stimulation (rSMS) can also be used to improve MT. A direct comparison of the effect size between rTMS and rSMS on the same MT is still lacking. Before conducting the study in patients, we determined the effect sizes of different stimulation approaches combined with the same motor training in healthy subjects. Two experiments (E1 and E2) with 96 subjects investigated the effect size of combining magnetic stimulation with the same MT. In E1, high-frequency rTMS, rSMS, and spinal sham stimulation (sham-spinal) were applied once in combination with MT, while one group only received the same MT (without stimulation). In E2, rTMS, rSMS, and sham-spinal were applied in combination with MT over several days. In all subjects, motor tests and motor-evoked potentials were evaluated before and after the intervention period. rTMS had the greatest effect on MT, followed by rSMS and then sham-spinal. Daily stimulation resulted in additional training gains. This study suggests that rSMS increases excitability and also enhances MT performance. This current study provides a basis for further research to discover whether patients who cannot be treated effectively with rTMS would benefit from rSMS.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Brain Sci Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Brain Sci Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany