Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Oral Dexmedetomidine Achieves Superior Effects in Mitigating Emergence Agitation and Demonstrates Comparable Sedative Effects to Oral Midazolam for Pediatric Premedication: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.
Jen, Chun-Kai; Lu, Kuo-Ching; Chen, Kuan-Wen; Lu, Yun-Ru; Huang, I-Tao; Huang, Yu-Chen; Huang, Chun-Jen.
Affiliation
  • Jen CK; Department of Anesthesiology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, 111, Sec. 3, Xinglong Rd., Wenshan Dist., Taipei 116, Taiwan.
  • Lu KC; Integrative Research Center for Critical Care, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 116, Taiwan.
  • Chen KW; Department of Anesthesiology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, 111, Sec. 3, Xinglong Rd., Wenshan Dist., Taipei 116, Taiwan.
  • Lu YR; Department of Anesthesiology, Binkun Women's and Children's Hospital, Taoyuan 324, Taiwan.
  • Huang IT; Department of Anesthesiology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, 111, Sec. 3, Xinglong Rd., Wenshan Dist., Taipei 116, Taiwan.
  • Huang YC; Integrative Research Center for Critical Care, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 116, Taiwan.
  • Huang CJ; Department of Anesthesiology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, 111, Sec. 3, Xinglong Rd., Wenshan Dist., Taipei 116, Taiwan.
J Clin Med ; 13(4)2024 Feb 19.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38398486
ABSTRACT

Background:

Oral midazolam is the most commonly used sedative premedication agent in pediatric patients. While effective, oral midazolam cannot reduce the incidence of emergence agitation. Oral dexmedetomidine may be effective in providing satisfactory sedation and reduce the incidence of emergence agitation, although the results of different randomized controlled trials are conflicting.

Methods:

This study enrolled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining premedication with oral dexmedetomidine versus oral midazolam in pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and the Web of Science database were searched from their inception until June 2023. The outcomes were the incidence of satisfactory preoperative sedation, satisfactory sedation during separation from parents, satisfactory sedation during anesthesia induction using an anesthesia mask, and the incidence of emergence agitation.

Results:

A total of 9 RCTs comprising 885 patients were analyzed. Our data revealed comparable effects of dexmedetomidine and midazolam with respect to satisfactory preoperative sedation and a satisfactory incidence of sedation during parental separation and mask acceptance before anesthesia induction. Notably, our data revealed that the rate of emergence agitation was significantly lower in pediatric patients receiving dexmedetomidine (n = 162) than in those receiving midazolam (n = 159) (odds ratio = 0.16; 95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.44; p < 0.001; I2 = 35%).

Conclusions:

Data from this meta-analysis revealed comparable effects for premedication with oral dexmedetomidine or oral midazolam with respect to satisfactory sedation; furthermore, premedication with oral dexmedetomidine more effectively mitigated emergence agitation in pediatric patients receiving general anesthesia compared with oral midazolam.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Clin Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwan

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Clin Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwan