Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Effects of a New Wireless Non-Adhesive Cardiorespiratory Monitoring Device on the Skin Conditions of Preterm Infants.
Lorente Flores, Carmen M; Zhan, Zhuozhao; Scholten, Anouk W J; Hutten, Gerard J; Vervoorn, Marieke; Niemarkt, Hendrik J.
Affiliation
  • Lorente Flores CM; Máxima Medical Center, Department of Neonatology, De Run 4600, 5504 DB Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
  • Zhan Z; Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 3, 5612 AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  • Scholten AWJ; Department of Neonatology, UMC location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Hutten GJ; Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Vervoorn M; Department of Neonatology, UMC location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Niemarkt HJ; Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sensors (Basel) ; 24(4)2024 Feb 16.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38400415
ABSTRACT

AIM:

The aim of our study was to investigate skin conditions when wearing and removing a novel wireless non-adhesive cardiorespiratory monitoring device for neonates (Bambi-Belt) compared to standard adhesive electrodes. STUDY

DESIGN:

This was a prospective study including preterm neonates requiring cardiorespiratory monitoring. Besides standard electrodes, the infants wore a Bambi Belt for 10 consecutive days. Their skin conditions were assessed using Trans Epidermal Water Loss (TEWL) and the Neonatal Skin Condition Score (NSCS) after daily belt and standard electrode removal. The ∆TEWL was calculated as the difference between the TEWL at the device's location (Bambi-Belt/standard electrode) and the adjacent control skin location, with a higher ∆TEWL indicating skin damage.

RESULTS:

A total of 15 infants (gestational age (GA) 24.1-35.6 wk) were analyzed. The ΔTEWL significantly increased directly after electrode removal (10.95 ± 9.98 g/m2/h) compared to belt removal (5.18 ± 6.71 g/m2/h; F 8.73, p = 0.004) and after the washout period (3.72 ± 5.46 g/m2/h vs. 1.86 ± 3.35 g/m2/h; F 2.84, p = 0.09), although the latter did not reach statistical significance. The TEWL was not influenced by prolonged belt wearing. No significant differences in the NSCS score were found between the belt and electrode (OR 0.69, 95% CI [0.17, 2.88], p = 0.6).

CONCLUSION:

A new wireless non-adhesive device for neonatal cardiorespiratory monitoring was well tolerated in preterm infants and may be less damaging during prolonged wearing.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Skin Diseases / Infant, Premature Limits: Humans / Newborn Language: En Journal: Sensors (Basel) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands Country of publication: Switzerland

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Skin Diseases / Infant, Premature Limits: Humans / Newborn Language: En Journal: Sensors (Basel) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands Country of publication: Switzerland