Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Translation, validity and reliability of the pain attitudes and beliefs scale for physiotherapists in French.
Soreau, Alexis; Ferey, Cassandre; Hardouin, Jean-Benoit; Draper-Rodi, Jerry; Sarzeaud, Robert; Benoist, Hélène; Ostelo, Raymond W; Merdy, Olivier.
Affiliation
  • Soreau A; Institut des Hautes Études Ostéopathiques (IdHEO), St-Herblain, France.
  • Ferey C; Institut des Hautes Études Ostéopathiques (IdHEO), St-Herblain, France.
  • Hardouin JB; UMR INSERM 1246 - SPHERE, Nantes Université, Université de Tours, Tours, France.
  • Draper-Rodi J; UMR INSERM 1246 - SPHERE, Nantes Université, Université de Tours, Tours, France.
  • Sarzeaud R; Service de santé publique - Plateforme de Méthodologie et de Biostatistique - CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France.
  • Benoist H; Research Centre, University College of Osteopathy, London, UK.
  • Ostelo RW; National Council for Osteopathic Research, London, UK.
  • Merdy O; Institut des Hautes Études Ostéopathiques (IdHEO), St-Herblain, France.
Physiother Res Int ; 29(2): e2078, 2024 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38430539
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists (PABS-PT) questionnaire evaluates manual therapists' biomedical and biopsychosocial beliefs regarding the management of chronic low back pain. Its usage in clinical settings is an important step in the implementation of national guidelines and policies to improve patient management.

OBJECTIVES:

The objective of this study was to translate the PABS-PT questionnaire into French, to adapt it culturally, and to conduct a psychometric analysis.

DESIGN:

Qualitative and cross-sectional study.

METHOD:

The translation process followed published guidelines with cross-cultural validation by an expert committee. We followed a forward and backward translation procedure and an expert committee, including the original author of the questionnaire and a linguistics expert ensuring good cultural adaptation, issued a finalised version. Psychometric analysis of the French version of the questionnaire was conducted among 390 French manual therapists in two phases. The first phase evaluated structural validity as well as external validity compared with the TSK and BBQ questionnaires. Then, reliability and scalability were analysed. The second phase evaluated test-retest reproducibility by sending the same questionnaire 3 months later.

RESULTS:

The validity study revealed three subscales the classic biomedical subscale and two subscales for biopsychosocial beliefs (aetiology of pain and physical activity). With 21 items in total for the PABS-PT-FR, the structural validity scores were good (BM alpha = 0.82, H = 0.38; Physical Activity alpha = 0.62, H = 0.32; Aetiology of Pain alpha = 0.55, H = 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS:

This study provides a validated tool to assess French physiotherapists' and, more generally, healthcare providers' beliefs about chronic low back pain, with a new insight into the BPS subscale internal construct.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Low Back Pain / Physical Therapists Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Physiother Res Int Journal subject: REABILITACAO Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: France

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Low Back Pain / Physical Therapists Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Physiother Res Int Journal subject: REABILITACAO Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: France