Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exposure and risk assessment for agricultural workers during chlorothalonil and flubendiamide treatments in pepper fields.
Lee, Deuk-Yeong; Song, Jong-Wook; An, Ji-Young; Kim, Yeong-Jin; Seo, Jong-Su; Kim, Jong-Hwan.
Affiliation
  • Lee DY; Environmental Safety-Assessment Center, Korea Institute of Toxicology (KIT), Jinju, 52834, Republic of Korea.
  • Song JW; Environmental Safety-Assessment Center, Korea Institute of Toxicology (KIT), Jinju, 52834, Republic of Korea.
  • An JY; Environmental Safety-Assessment Center, Korea Institute of Toxicology (KIT), Jinju, 52834, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim YJ; Environmental Safety-Assessment Center, Korea Institute of Toxicology (KIT), Jinju, 52834, Republic of Korea.
  • Seo JS; Environmental Safety-Assessment Center, Korea Institute of Toxicology (KIT), Jinju, 52834, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim JH; Environmental Safety-Assessment Center, Korea Institute of Toxicology (KIT), Jinju, 52834, Republic of Korea. jjong@kitox.re.kr.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 5338, 2024 03 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38438437
ABSTRACT
Pesticides are indispensable tools in modern agriculture for enhancing crop productivity. However, the inherent toxicity of pesticides raises significant concerns regarding human exposure, particularly among agricultural workers. This study investigated the exposure and associated risks of two commonly used pesticides in open-field pepper cultivation, namely, chlorothalonil and flubendiamide, in the Republic of Korea. We used a comprehensive approach, encompassing dermal and inhalation exposure measurements in agricultural workers during two critical scenarios mixing/loading and application. Results revealed that during mixing/loading, dermal exposure to chlorothalonil was 3.33 mg (0.0002% of the total active ingredient [a.i.]), while flubendiamide exposure amounted to 0.173 mg (0.0001% of the a.i.). Conversely, dermal exposure increased significantly during application to 648 mg (chlorothalonil) and 93.1 mg (flubendiamide), representing 0.037% and 0.065% of the total a.i., respectively. Inhalation exposure was also evident, with chlorothalonil and flubendiamide exposure levels varying across scenarios. Notably, the risk assessment using the Risk Index (RI) indicated acceptable risk of exposure during mixing/loading but raised concerns during application, where all RIs exceeded 1, signifying potential risk. We suggest implementing additional personal protective equipment (PPE) during pesticide application, such as gowns and lower-body PPE, to mitigate these risks.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pesticides / Phthalimides / Sulfones / Piper nigrum / Fluorocarbons / Nitriles Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pesticides / Phthalimides / Sulfones / Piper nigrum / Fluorocarbons / Nitriles Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2024 Document type: Article