Diagnostic value of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT combined with prostate specific antigen derived indicators in gray area prostate cancer. / 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CTèåååè
ºç¹å¼æ§æåè¡çææ 对ç°åºååè
ºççè¯æä»·å¼.
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban
; 48(12): 1812-1819, 2023 Dec 28.
Article
in En, Zh
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38448374
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES:
The incidence of prostate cancer is increasing every year, and precision diagnosis and treatment can help reduce unnecessary prostate punctures for prostate cancer patients in the gray area. This study aims to investigate the diagnostic value of 18F-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) imaging combined with prostate specific antigen (PSA)-derived indicators for gray zone prostate cancer.METHODS:
A total of 107 patients who underwent 18F-PSMA PET/CT imaging for suspicious prostate cancer with tPSA of 4 to 10 µg/L (PSA gray zone) in a hospital were retrospectively included, and were divided into a prostate cancer group and a non-prostate cancer group based on pathological findings. Patients underwent PSA testing, 18F-PSMA, and abdominal ultrasound, and age, tPSA, fPSA, f/tPSA, prostate volume, PSA density (PSAD), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and molecular imaging prostate specific membrane antigen (miPSMA) score were compared between the 2 groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors the diagnosis of gray zone prostate cancer. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to evaluate the efficacy of PSAD and SUVmax alone and in combination in diagnosing gray zone prostate cancer.RESULTS:
The volume of the prostate cancer group [42.00(34.00, 58.00) cm3 vs 49.00(41.27, 60.41) cm3] was smaller than that of the non-prostate cancer group (Z=-2.376, P=0.017), and the PSAD [(0.18±0.06) µg/(L·cm3) vs 0.15±0.05 µg/(L·cm3)] and SUVmax [18.63(8.03, 28.57) vs 9.33(5.90, 13.52)] were higher than those in the non-prostate cancer group (both P<0.05). The percentage of miPSMA score ≥2 in the prostate cancer group was higher than that in the non-prostate cancer group (χ2=40.987, P<0.001). PSAD (OR=22.154, 95% CI 1.430 to 873.751, P=0.042) and SUVmax (OR=1.301, 95% CI 1.034 to 1.678, P=0.009) were independent influential factors for the diagnosis of prostate cancer in the gray zone. The optimal cut-off values of PSAD and SUVmax were 0.22 µg/(L·cm3) and 8.02, respectively, and the AUCs for the diagnosis of prostate cancer in the gray zone alone and in combination were 0.628 (95% CI 0.530 to 0.720, P<0.05) and 0.806 (95% CI 0.718 to 0.876, P<0.05), 0.847 (95% CI 0.765 to 0.910, P<0.05), with sensitivities of 41.03%, 76.92%, and 74.36% and specificities of 79.41%, 89.71%, and 92.65%, respectively.CONCLUSIONS:
PSAD and SUVmax are increased in patients with gray zone prostate cancer, and the combination of PSAD and SUVmax is of high value in diagnosing gray zone prostate cancer.Key words
Full text:
1
Collection:
01-internacional
Database:
MEDLINE
Main subject:
Oligopeptides
/
Prostatic Neoplasms
/
Prostate-Specific Antigen
/
Niacinamide
Limits:
Humans
/
Male
Language:
En
/
Zh
Journal:
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban
Journal subject:
MEDICINA
Year:
2023
Document type:
Article