Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association of white blood cell parameters with metabolic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 168,000 patients.
Mahmood, Aysal; Haider, Hoorain; Samad, Saba; Kumar, Danisha; Perwaiz, Aimen; Mushtaq, Rabeea; Ali, Abraish; Farooq, Muhammad Zain; Farhat, Hadi.
Affiliation
  • Mahmood A; Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Haider H; Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Samad S; Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Kumar D; Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Perwaiz A; Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Mushtaq R; Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Ali A; Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Farooq MZ; Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
  • Farhat H; Faculty of Medicine, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(10): e37331, 2024 Mar 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38457562
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Leukocyte parameters are predicted to be affected in patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to study the association between white blood cell parameters (WBC) in people with and without MetS.

METHODS:

PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases were searched according to the study protocol. The standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of leukocyte markers between individuals with and without MetS were pooled using an inverse variance model. Additionally, a subgroup analysis by sex was performed where possible. Methodological quality assessment was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for observational studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs).

RESULTS:

Of 6068 articles identified, 63 were eligible for the study. Compared to controls, individuals with MetS showed significantly higher concentrations of total leukocyte count (SMD [95% CI] 0.60 [0.55-0.65]; P < .00001; I2 = 100%), neutrophil counts (0.32 [0.28-0.37]; P < .00001; I2 = 99%), lymphocyte counts (0.15 [0.07-0.23]; P = .0004; I2 = 100%), basophil counts (0.01 [0.00-0.02]; P = .02; I2 = 98%), monocyte counts (0.05 [0.02-0.09]; P = .003; I2 = 99%), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (0.24 [0.15-0.33]; P < .00001; I2 = 98%). There were no significant differences in the eosinophil count (0.02 [-0.01 to 0.05]; P = .19; I2 = 96%) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (0.06 [-0.05 to 0.17]; P = .27; I2 = 100%) between patients with and without MetS, however, the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (0.52 [-0.81 to -0.23]; P = .0005; I2 = 52%) tended to be significantly lower in patients with MetS.

CONCLUSION:

Biomarkers such as total leukocyte count, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, basophil count, monocyte count and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio are associated with higher levels in patients in MetS and thus can potentially be used for early detection of MetS.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Metabolic Syndrome Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Pakistan Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Metabolic Syndrome Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Pakistan Country of publication: United States