Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Conscientious Objection and Institutional Objection to Voluntary Assistance in Dying: An Ethico-legal Critique.
Kerridge, Ian; Stewart, Cameron; Scully, Jackie Leach; Chiarella, Mary; Hamblin, Julie; Johnson, Adam; Ryan, Christopher; Sheahan, Linda; Skowronski, George.
Affiliation
  • Kerridge I; Sydney Health Ethics, University of Sydney.
  • Stewart C; Sydney Health Law, University of Sydney.
  • Scully JL; Disability Innovation Institute, University of New South Wales.
  • Chiarella M; Sydney Nursing School, University of Sydney.
  • Hamblin J; Solicitor and Chair of Australian Volunteers International.
  • Johnson A; Northern Sydney Local Health District, NSW Ministry of Health.
  • Ryan C; Clinical Associate Professor, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney and University of New South Wales.
  • Sheahan L; Clinical Ethics Consultant, Clinical Ethics Committee, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District.
  • Skowronski G; St George & Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales.
J Law Med ; 30(4): 806-821, 2023 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38459874
ABSTRACT
This column examines conscientious objection and institutional objection in Australian voluntary assistance in dying. It reviews the current legislative regimes and then examines these practices from an ethical perspective, and raises particular concerns and suggestions with how conscientious objection and institutional objection should be operationalised.
Subject(s)
Key words
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Refusal to Treat / Conscience Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: J Law Med Journal subject: JURISPRUDENCIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Refusal to Treat / Conscience Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: J Law Med Journal subject: JURISPRUDENCIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article