Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Practices and Outcomes Associated With Sublingual Buprenorphine Use in a Critically Ill Population.
Vanini, Denis J; Corvelli, Jenna M; Maynard, Kaylee M; Rappaport, Stephen H; Grasso, Gina; Jones, Raquel; Acquisto, Nicole M; Schult, Rachel F.
Affiliation
  • Vanini DJ; Department of Pharmacy, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
  • Corvelli JM; Department of Pharmacy, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
  • Maynard KM; Department of Pharmacy, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
  • Rappaport SH; Department of Pharmacy, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
  • Grasso G; Department of Pharmacy, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
  • Jones R; Department of Pharmacy, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
  • Acquisto NM; Department of Pharmacy, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
  • Schult RF; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
Crit Care Explor ; 6(3): e1062, 2024 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38481543
ABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE Buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (OUD) is commonly used in the outpatient setting with increasing use in hospitalized patients. However, there is limited literature describing its use in critically ill populations.

OBJECTIVES:

The primary objective was to report the practices of buprenorphine prescribing among ICU teams. We also assessed the effect of a novel initiation strategy on opioid requirements in the ICU and the incidence of precipitated withdrawal. DESIGN SETTING

PARTICIPANTS:

Single-center, retrospective, descriptive study of patients receiving buprenorphine in the ICU. MAIN OUTCOMES AND

MEASURES:

The main outcome was to describe the use of buprenorphine in ICU patients through indication, initiation strategy, dosing information, and time from ICU admission to the first dose. We also detailed the incidence of precipitated withdrawal overall and the difference in opioid requirements before and after a low-dose induction strategy (buprenorphine initiated while receiving full agonist opioids [5-d titration from 150 µg to 4 mg four times daily]).

RESULTS:

A total of 153 patients were included. Most patients (86.3%) received buprenorphine for treatment of OUD. Of the 75 patients taking buprenorphine before admission, 46 (61%) had it restarted within 24 hours of ICU admission. Among 95 patients requiring buprenorphine induction, 57 (60%) underwent standard induction and 38 (40%) underwent low-dose induction, with only one instance of precipitated withdrawal. Median morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) of concomitant full agonist opioids in patients completing low-dose induction decreased from 1057.5 mg to 262.5 mg in the 24 hours before initiation compared with the 24 hours after target buprenorphine dose was reached (p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Use of sublingual buprenorphine was most often in patients with OUD. Timely continuation of home buprenorphine in the ICU was suboptimal. Both standard and low-dose induction strategies appear to be safe with a low risk of precipitating withdrawal. When implemented appropriately, low-dose buprenorphine induction may lead to significant reduction in full agonist opioids in critically ill patients.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Crit Care Explor Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Crit Care Explor Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States