Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Survival benefit in EGFR-wild and ALK negative NSCLC patients who participate in clinical trials compared to standard-of-care: Propensity-matched analysis.
Jung, Hyun Ae; Park, Boram; Park, Sehhoon; Sun, Jong-Mu; Lee, Se-Hoon; Seok Ahn, Jin; Ahn, Myung-Ju.
Affiliation
  • Jung HA; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Republic of Korea.
  • Park B; Biomedical Statistics Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Republic of Korea.
  • Park S; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Republic of Korea.
  • Sun JM; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee SH; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Republic of Korea.
  • Seok Ahn J; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Republic of Korea.
  • Ahn MJ; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: silk.ahn@samsung.com.
Lung Cancer ; 190: 107536, 2024 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38493759
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring EGFR mutation or ALK fusion have achieved significant survival benefit with targeted agents. In contrast, EGFR-wild type and ALK negative lung adenocarcinoma still have poor survival outcome. This study assessed the impact of participating in clinical trials on clinical outcomes in patients with EGFR-wild-type and ALK-negative lung adenocarcinoma. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This study included patients with advanced EGFR-wild-type and ALK-negative lung adenocarcinoma who received systemic treatment between March 2017 and June 2022. We compared clinical outcomes between patients who participated in clinical trials and those treated with standard-of-care (SOC) using propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS:

Overall, 1,686 patients with EGFR-wild-type and ALK-negative advanced lung adenocarcinoma were included in the final analysis. Of these, 1,380 (81.9 %) received SOC only and 306 (18.1 %) patients were enrolled in at least one clinical trial during their cancer journey. After PSM (11), 612 patients were matched to the SOC (n = 306) and clinical trial (n = 306) groups. Among those who participated in clinical trials, 27.8 % and 72.2 % were included in clinical trials involving targeted therapy and immunotherapy respectively. In the clinical trial group, more patients received targeted therapy (31.7 % vs. 5.5 %, p < 0.001) and immunotherapy (88.6 % vs. 62.8 %, p < 0.001) compared to the SOC group. The median overall survival was 17.1 months (95 % confidence interval [CI], 13.2-21.4) in the SOC group and 27.3 months (95 % CI, 22.1-32.4) in the clinical trial group (hazard ratio = 0.71, [95 % CI, 0.58-0.88, P = 0.002]).

CONCLUSIONS:

This study demonstrated that participating in clinical trials resulted in a survival benefit that reduced the risk of death by 29.6% compared to receiving SOC in EGFR-wild-type and ALK-negative lung adenocarcinoma.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / Adenocarcinoma of Lung / Lung Neoplasms Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Lung Cancer Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Ireland

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / Adenocarcinoma of Lung / Lung Neoplasms Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Lung Cancer Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: Ireland