Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quality of Refractive Error Care in Cambodia: An Unannounced Standardized Patient Study.
Burnett, Anthea; Meng, Ngy; Seiha, Do; Kong, Neath; Chea, Seila; Dean, Malis; Horm, Piseth; Meas, Kim San; Varga, Beatrice; Ho, Suit May; McGuinness, Myra; Lee, Ling.
Affiliation
  • Burnett A; International Programs Division, The Fred Hollows Foundation, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Meng N; School of Optometry and Vision Science, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
  • Seiha D; National Program for Eye Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
  • Kong N; National Program for Eye Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
  • Chea S; International Programs Division, The Fred Hollows Foundation Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
  • Dean M; International Programs Division, The Fred Hollows Foundation Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
  • Horm P; International Programs Division, The Fred Hollows Foundation Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
  • Meas KS; Eye Care Foundation, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
  • Varga B; International Programs Division, The Fred Hollows Foundation Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
  • Ho SM; International Programs Division, The Fred Hollows Foundation, Melbourne, Australia.
  • McGuinness M; International Programs Division, The Fred Hollows Foundation, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Lee L; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol ; : 1-9, 2024 Mar 20.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38507595
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Quality-of-care in refractive error services is essential, as it directly affects vision outcomes, wellbeing, educational attainment, and workforce participation. In Cambodia, uncorrected refractive error is a leading cause of mild and moderate vision impairment in adults. We evaluated the quality of refractive error care in Cambodia by estimating the proportion of prescribed and dispensed spectacles appropriate for people's refractive error needs and factors associated with spectacle quality.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional protocol was employed with 18 Khmer-speaking adult participants observing testing procedures in 156 optical services across six provinces in 2022. A total of 496 dispensed spectacles were assessed against spectacle quality indicators.

RESULTS:

The analysis revealed that 35.1% of dispensed spectacles were of optimal quality. The most common error observed in sub-optimal spectacles was the presence of horizontal prism outside of tolerance limits. The study also found that 44.0% of emmetrope visits involved unnecessary prescription spectacle recommendations, and 18.3% of written prescriptions did not correspond with dispensed spectacles. Sex differences were observed, with men predominantly providing refractive error care and women more likely to be unnecessarily recommended prescription spectacles.

CONCLUSION:

The findings highlight the importance of prioritizing quality-of-care in refractive error services. A key recommendation is to consider regulatory mechanisms to ensure optical services employ appropriately qualified staff. Additionally, efforts should be made to eliminate unnecessary prescriptions -- especially for emmetropes and females -- standardize written prescriptions, ensure consistent pupil distance measurements, reduce reliance on autorefraction, and address the gender imbalance in the refractive error workforce.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Ophthalmic Epidemiol Journal subject: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / OFTALMOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Ophthalmic Epidemiol Journal subject: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / OFTALMOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: United kingdom