Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analysis of tumor mutational burden and mutational landscape comparing whole-exome sequencing and comprehensive genomic profiling in patients with resectable early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.
Choi, Su-Jin; Lee, Jii Bum; Kim, Jae Hwan; Hong, Min Hee; Cho, Byoung Chul; Lim, Sun Min.
Affiliation
  • Choi SJ; Severance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Lee JB; Division of Medical Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Kim JH; Severance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Hong MH; Division of Medical Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Cho BC; Division of Medical Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Lim SM; Division of Medical Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.
Ther Adv Med Oncol ; 16: 17588359241240657, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38523846
ABSTRACT

Background:

Identifying actionable driver mutations via tissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is paramount in treatment decisions for metastatic non-squamous, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the role of CGP remains elusive in resectable NSCLC. Here, we elucidate the feasibility of CGP in early-stage NSCLC Korean patients and compare the tumor mutational burden (TMB) and mutation landscape using three different platforms.

Methods:

All surgically resected NSCLC samples (N = 96) were analyzed to assess the concordance in TMB calculation and targetable mutations using whole-exome sequencing (WES) and TruSight Oncology 500 (TSO500). In all, 26 samples were analyzed with Foundation One CDx Assay (F1CDx). Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was evaluated using Vectra Polaris.

Results:

Stage distribution post-surgery was 80% I (N = 77) and 20% II (N = 19). Ninety-nine percent (N = 95) were adenocarcinoma. The median TMB with WES and TSO500 was 1.6 and 4.7 mut/Mb, respectively (p < 0.05). Using all three platforms, the median TMB was 1.9, 5.5, and 4 mut/Mb for WES, TSO500, and F1CDx, respectively (p = 0.0048). Linear regression analysis of TMB values calculated between WES and TSO500 resulted in a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.83. For the PD-L1 tumor proportion score of <1% (negative, N = 18), 1-49% (low, N = 68), and ⩾50% (high, N = 10), the R2 values were 0.075, 0.79, and 0.95, respectively. The R2 values for TMB concordance were variable between the three platforms. Mutation landscape revealed EGFR mutation (51%, N = 49) as the most common actionable driver mutation, comprising L858R (N = 22), E19del (N = 20), and other non-common EGFR mutations (N = 7).

Conclusion:

TSO500 and F1CDx showed robust analytical performance for TMB assessment with TSO500 showing stronger concordance of TMB with high PD-L1 expression. As the paradigm for the management of early-resected NSCLC continues to evolve, understanding TMB and the mutation landscape may help advance clinical outcomes for this subset of patients.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Ther Adv Med Oncol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: South Korea Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Ther Adv Med Oncol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: South Korea Country of publication: United kingdom