Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Standardization of a CT Protocol for Imaging Patients with Suspected COVID-19-A RACOON Project.
Steuwe, Andrea; Kamp, Benedikt; Afat, Saif; Akinina, Alena; Aludin, Schekeb; Bas, Elif Gülsah; Berger, Josephine; Bohrer, Evelyn; Brose, Alexander; Büttner, Susanne Martina; Ehrengut, Constantin; Gerwing, Mirjam; Grosu, Sergio; Gussew, Alexander; Güttler, Felix; Heinrich, Andreas; Jiraskova, Petra; Kloth, Christopher; Kottlors, Jonathan; Kuennemann, Marc-David; Liska, Christian; Lubina, Nora; Manzke, Mathias; Meinel, Felix G; Meyer, Hans-Jonas; Mittermeier, Andreas; Persigehl, Thorsten; Schmill, Lars-Patrick; Steinhardt, Manuel; Antoch, Gerald; Valentin, Birte.
Affiliation
  • Steuwe A; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Kamp B; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Afat S; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
  • Akinina A; Clinic and Outpatient Clinic for Radiology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), 06120 Halle, Germany.
  • Aludin S; Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
  • Bas EG; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
  • Berger J; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
  • Bohrer E; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Giessen, Justus Liebig University, Klinikstr. 33, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
  • Brose A; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Giessen, Justus Liebig University, Klinikstr. 33, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
  • Büttner SM; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
  • Ehrengut C; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Liebigstraße 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
  • Gerwing M; Clinic of Radiology, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
  • Grosu S; Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
  • Gussew A; Clinic and Outpatient Clinic for Radiology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), 06120 Halle, Germany.
  • Güttler F; Department of Radiology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, 07747 Jena, Germany.
  • Heinrich A; Department of Radiology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, 07747 Jena, Germany.
  • Jiraskova P; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany.
  • Kloth C; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
  • Kottlors J; Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
  • Kuennemann MD; Clinic of Radiology, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
  • Liska C; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
  • Lubina N; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
  • Manzke M; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Paediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medical Centre Rostock, Schillingallee 36, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
  • Meinel FG; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Paediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medical Centre Rostock, Schillingallee 36, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
  • Meyer HJ; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Liebigstraße 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
  • Mittermeier A; Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
  • Persigehl T; Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
  • Schmill LP; Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
  • Steinhardt M; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany.
  • Antoch G; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Valentin B; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Bioengineering (Basel) ; 11(3)2024 Feb 22.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38534481
ABSTRACT
CT protocols that diagnose COVID-19 vary in regard to the associated radiation exposure and the desired image quality (IQ). This study aims to evaluate CT protocols of hospitals participating in the RACOON (Radiological Cooperative Network) project, consolidating CT protocols to provide recommendations and strategies for future pandemics. In this retrospective study, CT acquisitions of COVID-19 patients scanned between March 2020 and October 2020 (RACOON phase 1) were included, and all non-contrast protocols were evaluated. For this purpose, CT protocol parameters, IQ ratings, radiation exposure (CTDIvol), and central patient diameters were sampled. Eventually, the data from 14 sites and 534 CT acquisitions were analyzed. IQ was rated good for 81% of the evaluated examinations. Motion, beam-hardening artefacts, or image noise were reasons for a suboptimal IQ. The tube potential ranged between 80 and 140 kVp, with the majority between 100 and 120 kVp. CTDIvol was 3.7 ± 3.4 mGy. Most healthcare facilities included did not have a specific non-contrast CT protocol. Furthermore, CT protocols for chest imaging varied in their settings and radiation exposure. In future, it will be necessary to make recommendations regarding the required IQ and protocol parameters for the majority of CT scanners to enable comparable IQ as well as radiation exposure for different sites but identical diagnostic questions.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Bioengineering (Basel) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Bioengineering (Basel) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany