Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A More Comfortable Method for Hydrostatic Weighing: Head above Water at Total Lung Capacity.
White, Erin; Bergen, Silas; Berggren, Annabelle; Brinkman, Lillian; Carman, Brianna; Crouse, Lucas; Hoffmann, Emma; Twedt, Sara.
Affiliation
  • White E; Department of Health, Exercise and Rehabilitative Sciences, Winona State University, Winona, MN 55987, USA.
  • Bergen S; Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Winona State University, Winona, MN 55987, USA.
  • Berggren A; Department of Health, Exercise and Rehabilitative Sciences, Winona State University, Winona, MN 55987, USA.
  • Brinkman L; Department of Health, Exercise and Rehabilitative Sciences, Winona State University, Winona, MN 55987, USA.
  • Carman B; Department of Health, Exercise and Rehabilitative Sciences, Winona State University, Winona, MN 55987, USA.
  • Crouse L; Department of Health, Exercise and Rehabilitative Sciences, Winona State University, Winona, MN 55987, USA.
  • Hoffmann E; Department of Health, Exercise and Rehabilitative Sciences, Winona State University, Winona, MN 55987, USA.
  • Twedt S; Department of Health, Exercise and Rehabilitative Sciences, Winona State University, Winona, MN 55987, USA.
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol ; 9(1)2024 Feb 28.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38535421
ABSTRACT
Hydrostatic weighing (HW) requires full submersion with the lungs at residual volume (RV) which is uncomfortable. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to find a more comfortable way to complete HW. A HW system was used to complete three comparisons comparison 1 change in head position (head above water vs. head below water (HAW vs. HBW)), comparison 2 change in lung volume (total lung capacity (TLC) vs. RV), and comparison 3 change in head and lung volume changes. Participants were separated by males (n = 64) and females (n = 58). Comparison 1 HAW resulted in higher mean percent body fat (PBF) than HBW (4.5% overall, 3.8% in males, 5.4% in females, p < 0.05). Comparison 2 TLC resulted in lower mean PBF than RV (5.1% overall, 5.3% in males, 4.8% in females, p < 0.05). Comparison 3 HAW@TLC resulted in significantly lower (1.5% lower, p = 0.003) mean PBF for males but was not significantly lower for females or overall (0.6% higher, p = 0.39, 0.6% lower, p = 0.18, respectively) compared to HBW@RV. In conclusion, keeping the head above water and taking a deep inhale makes HW a more enjoyable, and accessible experience for everyone while still producing accurate PBF results.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Funct Morphol Kinesiol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Funct Morphol Kinesiol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States