Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patients' evaluation of aftercare following hospitalization for COVID-19: satisfaction and unmet needs.
Berentschot, Julia C; de Ridder, Willemijn A; Bek, L Martine; Heijenbrok-Kal, Majanka H; Braunstahl, Gert-Jan; Remerie, Sylvia C; Stuip, Yvonne; Ribbers, Gerard M; Aerts, Joachim G J V; Ista, Erwin; Hellemons, Merel E; van den Berg-Emons, Rita J G.
Affiliation
  • Berentschot JC; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. j.berentschot@erasmusmc.nl.
  • de Ridder WA; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Bek LM; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Heijenbrok-Kal MH; Hand and Wrist Center, Xpert Clinics, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  • Braunstahl GJ; Center for Hand Therapy, Xpert Handtherapie, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  • Remerie SC; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Stuip Y; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Ribbers GM; Rijndam Rehabilitation, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Aerts JGJV; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Franciscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Ista E; Rijndam Rehabilitation, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Hellemons ME; Zorghoek Bergschenhoek, Bergschenhoek, The Netherlands.
  • van den Berg-Emons RJG; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Respir Res ; 25(1): 145, 2024 Mar 29.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38553722
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Patient experiences with COVID-19 aftercare remain largely unknown. We evaluated COVID-19 aftercare from a patient perspective one year after hospitalization, assessing satisfaction and its associated factors, and unmet needs.

METHODS:

The Satisfaction with COVID-19 Aftercare Questionnaire (SCAQ) was developed as part of a multicenter prospective cohort study and administered one year after hospital discharge. The SCAQ assesses (1) patient satisfaction, comprising information provision, rehabilitation, follow-up by hospitals and general practitioners (GPs), the most important aftercare topics, and overall satisfaction, and (2) unmet needs.

RESULTS:

487/561 (87%) COVID-19 patients completed the SCAQ, all had been discharged from the hospital between March 2020 and May 2021. Among responders, the median age of patients was 60 (IQR 54-67) years, 338 (69%) were male, and the median length of stay in the hospital was 13 (6-27) days. Patients were least satisfied with information on who could be contacted with questions when health problems arise (59% satisfied or very satisfied). Many patients (75%) received rehabilitation, most frequently community-based (70%). Across the different community-based therapies, ≥ 60% of patients were satisfied with shared-decision making and ≥ 70% with the received therapy; a majority (≥ 79%) indicated a preference for receiving the same therapy again if needed. Regarding follow-up by hospitals, 86% of patients received this follow-up, most frequently visiting a pulmonologist (96%), being generally satisfied with the received aftercare. Aftercare from GPs was received by 39% of patients, with 88% being satisfied with the GP's availability and 79% with referral to appropriate aftercare providers. Patients (> 50%) considered information-related items most important in aftercare. Overall, patients rated their satisfaction with aftercare 8/10 (7-9) points. Those who received medical rehabilitation (versus no rehabilitation, adjusted beta 0.61 [95%CI 0.11 to 1.11], p = 0.02) or aftercare by a hospital medical specialist (1.1 [0.46 to 1.64], p < 0.001) or GP (0.39 [0.053 to 0.72], p = 0.023) reported significantly higher satisfaction than those without such aftercare. Unmet needs were reported by 35% of patients, with lack of information (20%) and lack of additional aftercare and/or involvement of their GP (19%) being the most frequently reported.

CONCLUSION:

Despite the forced quick development of COVID-19 aftercare, patients were generally satisfied. Follow-up by healthcare professionals and information provision is important to meet patients' aftercare needs.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aftercare / COVID-19 Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Respir Res Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aftercare / COVID-19 Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Respir Res Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands Country of publication: United kingdom