Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Peer support for adults with type 2 diabetes starting continuous glucose monitoring-An exploratory randomised controlled trial.
Lind, Nanna; Christensen, Merete Bechmann; Hansen, Dorte Lindqvist; Willaing, Ingrid; Nørgaard, Kirsten.
Affiliation
  • Lind N; Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
  • Christensen MB; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Hansen DL; Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
  • Willaing I; Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
  • Nørgaard K; Department of Health Promotion Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Diabet Med ; 41(6): e15321, 2024 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38576173
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

To explore the feasibility and potential benefits of a peer support programme for adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D) starting continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).

METHODS:

This part of the Steno2tech study is an exploratory, single-centre, open-labelled, prospective, randomised controlled trial (RCT). A total of 60 participants were randomised 21 to 12 months of CGM with or without peer support. All participants received a 3-h diabetes self-management education course including a CGM part on how to use the CGM and interpret the CGM-derived data. Peer support consisted of three 3-h peer support meetings over the first 6 months of the study period with groups of three to six people. The exploratory outcomes included the acceptability and feasibility of the peer support intervention, and the between-group difference in change in several glycaemic, metabolic and participant-reported outcomes measured at baseline, 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS:

The peer support intervention was found acceptable and feasible. Participants shared their experiences of using and interpreting CGM data and its association with health behaviour. While both groups had improvements in glycaemic, metabolic and participant-reported outcomes, there were no significant between-group differences.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although feasible, we found no measured additional benefits when adding a peer support programme after starting CGM in this exploratory RCT including adults with insulin-treated T2D. Understanding the perceived effect of and preferences for a peer support intervention from the participants' points of view, including why individuals declined to participate, would be of value for future research.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Peer Group / Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Diabet Med Journal subject: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Denmark

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Peer Group / Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Diabet Med Journal subject: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Denmark
...