Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is barbed better? Evaluation of triclosan-coated barbed suture on wound complications following emergency laparotomy.
Dilday, Joshua; McGillen, Patrick; Park, Stephen; Gallagher, Shea; Lee, Heewon; Schellenberg, Morgan; Matsushima, Kazuhide; Inaba, Kenji; Martin, Matthew J.
Affiliation
  • Dilday J; From the Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (J.D.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; and Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care (P.M., S.P., S.G., H.L., M.S., K.M., K.I., M.J.M.), LAC+USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 97(1): 149-157, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38595220
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Emergent laparotomy is associated with significant wound complications including surgical site infections (SSIs) and fascial dehiscence. Triclosan-coated barbed (TCB) suture for fascial closure has been shown to reduce local complications but primarily in elective settings. We sought to evaluate the effect of TCB emergency laparotomy fascial closure on major wound complications.

METHODS:

Adult patients undergoing emergency laparotomy were prospectively evaluated over 1 year. Patients were grouped into TCB versus polydioxanone (PDS) for fascial closure. Subanalysis was performed on patients undergoing single-stage laparotomy. Primary outcomes were SSI and fascial dehiscence. Multivariate analysis identified independent factors associated with SSI and fascial dehiscence.

RESULTS:

Of the 206 laparotomies, 73 (35%) were closed with TCB, and 133 (65%) were closed with PDS. Trauma was the reason for laparotomy in 73% of cases; damage-control laparotomy was performed in 27% of cases. The overall rate of SSI and fascial dehiscence was 18% and 10%, respectively. Operative strategy was similar between groups, including damage-control laparotomy, wound vac use, skin closure, and blood products. Surgical site infection events trended lower with TCB versus PDS closure (11% vs. 21%, p = 0.07), and fascial dehiscence was significantly lower with TCB versus PDS (4% vs. 14%, p < 0.05). Subanalysis of trauma and nontrauma cases showed no difference in SSI or fascial dehiscence. Multivariable analysis found that TCB decreased the likelihood of fascial dehiscence (odds ratio, 0.07; p < 0.05) following emergency laparotomy. Increased odds of fascial dehiscence were seen in damage-control laparotomy (odds ratio, 3.1; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

Emergency laparotomy fascial closure with TCB showed significantly decreased rates of fascial dehiscence compared with closure with PDS and a strong trend toward lower SSI events. Triclosan-coated barbed suture was independently associated with decreased fascial dehiscence rates after emergency laparotomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Surgical Wound Dehiscence / Surgical Wound Infection / Sutures / Triclosan / Laparotomy Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Surgical Wound Dehiscence / Surgical Wound Infection / Sutures / Triclosan / Laparotomy Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article