Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Usage of Different Diagnostic Aids for Oral Cancer by Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons: An Original Research.
Beniwal, Sunil K; Gopalakrishna, Sagar; Thakkar, Radhika; Thind, Gurinder B S; Bennadi, Darshana; Dupare, Aditya S; Tiwari, Rahul.
Affiliation
  • Beniwal SK; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rayat Bahra Dental College and Hospital, Mohali, Punjab, India.
  • Gopalakrishna S; Department of Dentistry, Kodagu Institute of Medical Sciences, Madikeri, Karnataka, India.
  • Thakkar R; Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.
  • Thind GBS; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, M. M. College of Dental Sciences and Research, Maharishi Markandeshwar Deemed to be University Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India.
  • Bennadi D; Department of Public Health Dentistry, Sri Siddhartha Dental College and Hospital, Sri Siddhartha Academy of Higher Education, Tumkur, Karnataka, India.
  • Dupare AS; Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Yogita Dental College and Hospital, Khed District Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India.
  • Tiwari R; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, RKDF Dental College and Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci ; 16(Suppl 1): S272-S275, 2024 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38595614
ABSTRACT

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to assess how oral and maxillofacial surgeons used various diagnostic tools for oral cancer. Materials and

Methods:

A cross-sectional methodology was used, and a standardized questionnaire was given to oral and maxillofacial surgeons randomly chosen sample. The questionnaire gathered information on demographics and the use of diagnostic tools. Data analysis methods included Chi-square testing and descriptive statistics.

Results:

The study included 200 oral and maxillofacial surgeons in total. The most often used diagnostic tool (95%) was visual inspection, followed by toluidine blue staining (48%) and brush biopsy (32%). Less frequently used were newer methods like optical coherence tomography (12.5%) and autofluorescence imaging (15%). No significant correlations between demographic factors and patterns of use of diagnostic tools were found by Chi-square tests.

Conclusion:

The results show that oral and maxillofacial surgeons frequently use brush biopsy, toluidine blue staining, and ocular evaluation. However, there is a need for more widespread adoption of cutting-edge technologies. By removing obstacles and offering training opportunities, one can increase the use of diagnostic tools, improving patient outcomes and the diagnosis of oral cancer.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Pharm Bioallied Sci Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: India Country of publication: India

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Pharm Bioallied Sci Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: India Country of publication: India