Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Voiding cystourethrography in patients undergoing endoscopic decompression of duplex system ureteroceles: to do or not to do?
Contini, Giorgia; Mele, Ermelinda; Barneschi, Andrea Celeste; Esposito, Ciro; Castagnetti, Marco.
Affiliation
  • Contini G; Division of Pediatric Urology, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza Sant'Onofrio, 4, 00165, Rome, Italy.
  • Mele E; Division of Pediatric Urology, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza Sant'Onofrio, 4, 00165, Rome, Italy.
  • Barneschi AC; Division of Pediatric Urology, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza Sant'Onofrio, 4, 00165, Rome, Italy.
  • Esposito C; Division of Pediatric Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
  • Castagnetti M; Division of Pediatric Urology, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza Sant'Onofrio, 4, 00165, Rome, Italy. marco.castagnetti@unipd.it.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 40(1): 103, 2024 Apr 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38598017
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the role of voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) in patients with duplex system ureterocele (DSU) undergoing endoscopic decompression (ED). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This is a retrospective study of 75 consecutive patients with DSU undergoing ED [median (range) age, 6 (1-148) months]. Patients were divided into 3 groups, 33 with a VCUG showing vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) before ED (VUR-group), 22 with a VCUG negative for VUR (No-VUR-group), and 20 who did not undergo a VCUG (No-VCUG-group). Secondary surgery (SS) rate was compared among groups.

RESULTS:

Groups were comparable for baseline characteristics. SS rate was 82% (27/33) in VUR-group vs. 32% (7/22) in the No-VUR-group (p = 0.0001), and 25% (5/20) in the No-VCUG-group (p = 0.001 vs. VUR-group, and 1 vs. No-VUR-group). In the VUR-group, 9 patients underwent preemptive endoscopic treatment of VUR during ED and SS rate was 44% (4/9) vs. 96% (23/24) in the remainder, p= 0.003. In the No-VCUG-group, a VCUG was performed during follow-up in 9/15 patients and showed reflux in all, although only 2 of these developed a (single) urinary tract infections.

CONCLUSIONS:

SS rate was significantly higher in patients with preoperative VUR. Instead, it was not significantly different between patients without VUR and those who did not undergo a VCUG before ED, despite all the latter who underwent a VCUG during follow-up had evidence of VUR generally in the absence of symptoms. In our opinion, a VCUG could be limited to patients developing symptoms after ED. If a VCUG is performed before ED, a preemptive treatment of VUR should be taken into consideration.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ureterocele / Vesico-Ureteral Reflux Limits: Humans / Infant Language: En Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Journal subject: PEDIATRIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Italy Country of publication: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ureterocele / Vesico-Ureteral Reflux Limits: Humans / Infant Language: En Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Journal subject: PEDIATRIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Italy Country of publication: Germany