Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Placement of immediate dental implants in extraction sockets exhibiting the apical pathosis. A meta-analysis.
Mohammed AlMugeiren, Osamah; Salem Assari, Ahmad; Abdullah Alshehri, Khalid; Abdulaziz Alsharidah, Mohammed; Alotaibi, Abdulelah N; Hamad Alzaid, Abdullah.
Affiliation
  • Mohammed AlMugeiren O; Preventive Dentistry Department, College of Medicine and Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Salem Assari A; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Diagnostic Sciences Department, College of Medicine and Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Abdullah Alshehri K; College of Medicine and Dentistry , Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Abdulaziz Alsharidah M; College of Medicine and Dentistry , Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Alotaibi AN; College of Medicine and Dentistry , Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Hamad Alzaid A; College of Medicine and Dentistry , Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res ; 14(3): 290-300, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38601261
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

It is commonly accepted that immediate implantation is the best option for patients since it shortens the time patients must wait for ultimate restoration and provides a predictable functional and aesthetic result. However, this approach is still controversial in patients with apical pathosis. The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of immediate implant insertion in patients with apical pathosis. Material and

methods:

Between 2000 and 2023, PRISMA-compliant keywords were used to search PubMed, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and the Cochrane Library. All English-language clinical studies that met PICOS criteria were included in a manual search. The included studies' demographic profile and event data for immediate dental implantation success in patients with or without apical pathosis were meta-analyzed using RevMan. The implant survival rate was assessed using risk ratio of plaque index and bleeding index. Begg's test using MedCalc and RevMan risk of bias assessment assessed publication bias.

Results:

A meta-analysis of 10 trials with 849 dental implantation patients found a substantial difference in initial implant placement success rates in infected sites. The pooled risk ratio for plaque index is 0.59 (95% CI 0.36-0.96) with heterogeneity of Tau2 = 0.62, chi2 = 109.69, df = 11, I2 = 90%, z = 2.12, and p < 0.05. While, the pooled risk ratio for bleeding index is 0.77 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.98) with Tau2 = 0.16, chi2 = 103.67, df = 11, I2 = 89%, z = 2.12, and p < 0.05. The pooled odds ratio of implant survival rate is 2.08 (95% CI 1.56 to 1.79) with Tau2 0.16; chi2 52.43; df 9; I2 83%; z 4.93 and p < 0.05. As evidenced by the funnel plot and statistically insignificant Begg's test p values of 0.45.

Conclusion:

The placement of immediate implants in locations affected by apical pathosis is a clinically beneficial surgery, resulting in favorable aesthetic and functional outcomes for patients.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Oral Biol Craniofac Res Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Saudi Arabia Country of publication: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Oral Biol Craniofac Res Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Saudi Arabia Country of publication: Netherlands