Investigation of synthetic MRI with quantitative parameters for discriminating axillary lymph nodes status in invasive breast cancer.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential value of quantitative parameters derived from synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (syMRI) for discriminating axillary lymph nodes metastasis (ALNM) in breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 56 females with histopathologically proven invasive breast cancer who underwent both conventional breast MRI and additional syMRI examinations were enrolled in this study, including 30 patients with ALNM and 26 with non-ALNM. SyMRI has enabled quantification of T1 relaxation time (T1), T2 relaxation time (T2) and proton density (PD). The syMRI quantitative parameters of breast primary tumors before (T1tumor, T2tumor, PDtumor) and after (T1+tumor, T2+tumor, PD+tumor) contrast agent injection were obtained. Similarly, measurements were taken for axillary lymph nodes before (T1LN, T2LN, PDLN) and after (T1+LN, T2+LN, PD+LN) the injection, then theΔT1 (T1-T1+), ΔT2 (T2-T2+), ΔPD (PD-PD+), T1/T2 and T1+/T2+ were calculated. All parameters were compared between ANLM and non-ALNM group. Intraclass correlation coefficient for assessing interobserver agreement. The independent Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test to determine the relationship between the mean quantitative values and the ALNM. Multivariate logistic regression analyses followed by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis for discriminating ALN status. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The short-diameter of lymph nodes (DLN) in ALNM group was significantly longer than that in the non-ALNM group (10.22 ± 3.58 mm vs. 5.28 ± 1.39 mm, P < 0.001). The optimal cutoff value was determined to be 5.78 mm, with an AUC of 0.894 (95 % CI 0.838-0.939), a sensitivity of 86.7 %, and a specificity of 90.2 %. In syMRI quantitative parameters of breast tumors, T2tumor, ΔT2tumor and ΔPDtumor values showed statistically significant differences between the two groups (P < 0.05). T2tumor value had the best performance in discriminating ALN status (AUC = 0.712), and the optimal cutoff was 90.12 ms, the sensitivity and specificity were 65.0 % and 83.6 % respectively. In terms of syMRI quantitative parameters of lymph nodes, T1LN, T2LN, T1LN/T2LN, T2+LN and ΔT1LN values were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05), and their AUCs were 0.785, 0.840, 0.886, 0.702 and 0.754, respectively. Multivariate analyses indicated that the T1LN value was the only independent predictor of ALNM (OR=1.426, 95 % CI 1.130-1.798, P = 0.039). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of T1LN was 86.7 % and 69.4 % respectively at the best cutoff point of 1371.00 ms. The combination of T1LN, T2LN, T1LN/T2LN, ΔT1LN and DLN had better performance for differentiating ALNM and non-ALNM, with AUCs of 0.905, 0.957, 0.964 and 0.897, respectively. CONCLUSION: The quantitative parameters derived from syMRI have certain value for discriminating ALN status in invasive breast cancer, with T2tumor showing the highest diagnostic efficiency among breast lesions parameters. Moreover, T1LN acted as an independent predictor of ALNM.