Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Secondary School State Athletic Association Health and Safety Policy Development Processes.
Yeargin, Susan; Hirschhorn, Rebecca M; Adams, William M; Scarneo-Miller, Samantha E.
Affiliation
  • Yeargin S; University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly St, PHRC Rm 226, Columbia, SC, 29208.
  • Hirschhorn RM; Louisiana State University, School of Kinesiology, 2213 Pleasant Hall, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803.
  • Adams WM; Sports Medicine Research, Division of Sports Medicine, United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee, 1 Olympic Plaza, Colorado Springs, CO, 80917.
  • Scarneo-Miller SE; School of Medicine, Division of Athletic Training, West Virginia University, 1 Medical Center Drive, 8501A Health Science Center South, Morgantown, WV, 26508.
J Sch Health ; 94(7): 591-600, 2024 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38621415
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The National Federation of State High School Associations provides recommendations regarding health and safety policies; however, policy development is governed at the state level. Given interstate differences in governance, the primary purpose was to describe processes that State High School Athletic Associations (SHSAAs) utilize to develop a new policy. The secondary objective was to determine what methods associations use to implement new policies.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional survey requested SHSAA (n = 51) representatives to report how athlete health and safety policies are introduced, revised, approved, and implemented within their state. The 22-question survey was developed to gather variables for the aims of the study. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each survey item.

RESULTS:

Of states who responded (n = 33), most reported a 2-committee (n = 24, 72.7%) process for developing and vetting policies, with initiation from the Sports Medicine Advisory Committee (n = 27, 81.8%), followed by an executive-level committee (n = 18, 66.7%). States reported total time from policy initiation to final approval ranged from 2 weeks to over 12 months. When a new policy was approved, most states indicated implementation began with an e-mail (n = 24, 72.7%) sent to Athletic Directors (n = 26, 78.8%). School principal or district superintendent were reported as the position in charge of compliance (36.4%, n = 12).

CONCLUSIONS:

Most SHSAAs use a 2-step process to write and review an athlete health and safety policy before approval. SHSAAs that require a longer policy development time could delay the implementation of important health measures. SHSAAs could consider additional communication methods to ensure information reaches all stakeholders.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Policy Making / Schools / Sports / Health Policy Limits: Adolescent / Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Sch Health Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Policy Making / Schools / Sports / Health Policy Limits: Adolescent / Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Sch Health Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States