Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Professional quality of life in animal research personnel is linked to retention & job satisfaction: A mixed-methods cross-sectional survey on compassion fatigue in the USA.
Young, Lauren; Ferrara, Fabienne; Kelly, Lisa; Martin, Tara; Thompson-Iritani, Sally; LaFollette, Megan R.
Affiliation
  • Young L; Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
  • Ferrara F; The 3Rs Collaborative, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
  • Kelly L; Consulting and Training in Animal Research, Berlin, Germany.
  • Martin T; University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
  • Thompson-Iritani S; Refinement and Enrichment Advancements Laboratory, Unit for Laboratory Animal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
  • LaFollette MR; Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, Office of Research, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 19(4): e0298744, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38626016
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Working with research animals can be both rewarding and challenging. The rewarding part of the work is associated with understanding the necessity for animal research to improve the health of humans and animals and the knowledge that one can provide care and compassion for the animals. Challenges with animal research include witnessing stress/pain in animals necessitated by scientific requirements, end of study euthanasia, and societal stigmatization about animal research. These challenges could be compounded with more general workplace stresses, in turn, impacting job retention and satisfaction. However, these factors have yet to be formally evaluated. Therefore, the purpose of this survey was to comprehensively evaluate professional quality of life's correlation with key workplace metrics.

METHODS:

Six institutions were recruited to participate in a longitudinal intervention trial on compassion fatigue resiliency. This manuscript reports key baseline metrics from this survey. A cross-sectional mixed methods survey was developed to evaluate professional quality of life, job satisfaction, retention, and factors influencing compassion fatigue resiliency. Quantitative data were analyzed via general linear models and qualitative data were analyzed by theme.

RESULTS:

Baseline data was collected from 198 participants. Personnel who reported higher compassion satisfaction also reported higher retention and job satisfaction. Conversely, personnel who reported higher burnout also reported lower job satisfaction. In response to open-ended questions, participants said their compassion fatigue was impacted by institutional culture (70% of participants), animal research (58%), general mental health (41%), and specific compassion fatigue support (24%).

CONCLUSIONS:

In conclusion, these results show that professional quality of life is related to important operational metrics of job satisfaction and retention. Furthermore, compassion fatigue is impacted by factors beyond working with research animals, including institutional culture and general mental health support. Overall, this project provides rationale and insight for institutional support of compassion fatigue resiliency.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Burnout, Professional / Animal Experimentation / Compassion Fatigue Limits: Animals / Humans Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Burnout, Professional / Animal Experimentation / Compassion Fatigue Limits: Animals / Humans Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada
...