Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Preoperative MRI-based endplate quality: a novel tool for predicting cage subsidence after anterior cervical spine surgery.
Tuo, Yuan; Lin, Kaiyuan; Yang, Junsong; Wang, Sibo; Abudouaini, Haimiti.
Affiliation
  • Tuo Y; Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 76, Nanguo Road, Beilin District, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
  • Lin K; Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 76, Nanguo Road, Beilin District, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
  • Yang J; Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 76, Nanguo Road, Beilin District, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
  • Wang S; Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 76, Nanguo Road, Beilin District, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
  • Abudouaini H; Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 76, Nanguo Road, Beilin District, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China. hmtspine@163.com.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 19(1): 245, 2024 Apr 16.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627743
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The objective of this study was to examine the predictive value of a newly developed MRI-based Endplate Bone Quality (EBQ) in relation to the development of cage subsidence following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS:

Patients undergoing ACDF for degenerative cervical diseases between January 2017 and June 2022 were included. Correlation between EBQ scores and segmental height loss was analyzed using Pearson's correlation. ROC analyses were employed to ascertain the EBQ cut-off values that predict the occurrence of cage subsidence. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the risk factors associated with postoperative cage subsidence.

RESULTS:

23 individuals (14.56%) exhibited the cage subsidence after ACDF. In the nonsubsidence group, the average EBQ and lowest T-score were determined to be 4.13 ± 1.14 and - 0.84 ± 1.38 g/cm2 respectively. In contrast, the subsidence group exhibited a mean EBQ and lowest T-score of 5.38 ± 0.47 (p < 0.001) and - 1.62 ± 1.34 g/cm2 (p = 0.014), respectively. There was a significant positive correlation (r = 0.798**) between EBQ and the segmental height loss. The EBQ threshold of 4.70 yielded optimal sensitivity (73.9%) and specificity (93.3%) with AUC of 0.806. Furthermore, the lowest T-score (p = 0.045, OR 0.667) and an elevated cervical EBQ score (p < 0.001, OR 8.385) were identified as significant risk factors for cage subsidence after ACDF.

CONCLUSIONS:

The EBQ method presents itself as a promising and efficient tool for surgeons to assess patients at risk of cage subsidence and osteoporosis prior to cervical spine surgery, utilizing readily accessible patient data.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Fusion / Cervical Vertebrae Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Fusion / Cervical Vertebrae Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China