Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dysexecutive difficulty and subtle everyday functional disabilities: the digital Trail Making Test.
Libon, David J; Swenson, Rod; Tobyne, Sean; Jannati, Ali; Schulman, Daniel; Price, Catherine C; Lamar, Melissa; Pascual-Leone, Alvaro.
Affiliation
  • Libon DJ; Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology, New Institute for Successful Aging, Rowan University-School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ, United States.
  • Swenson R; Department of Psychology, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ, United States.
  • Tobyne S; University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Grand Forks, ND, United States.
  • Jannati A; Linus Health, Boston, MA, United States.
  • Schulman D; Linus Health, Boston, MA, United States.
  • Price CC; Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
  • Lamar M; Linus Health, Boston, MA, United States.
  • Pascual-Leone A; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Front Neurol ; 15: 1354647, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38633534
ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital neuropsychological tests reliably capture real-time, process-based behavior that traditional paper/pencil tests cannot detect, enabling earlier detection of neurodegenerative illness. We assessed relations between informant-based subtle and mild functional decline and process-based features extracted from the digital Trail Making Test-Part B (dTMT-B).

Methods:

A total of 321 community-dwelling participants (56.0% female) were assessed with the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) and the dTMT-B. Three FAQ groups were constructed FAQ = 0 (unimpaired); FAQ = 1-4 (subtle impairment); FAQ = 5-8 (mild impairment).

Results:

Compared to the FAQ-unimpaired group, other groups required longer pauses inside target circles (p < 0.050) and produced more total pen strokes to complete the test (p < 0.016). FAQ-subtle participants required more time to complete the entire test (p < 0.002) and drew individual lines connecting successive target circles slower (p < 0.001) than FAQ-unimpaired participants. Lines connecting successive circle targets were less straight among FAQ-mild, compared to FAQ-unimpaired participants (p < 0.044). Using stepwise nominal regression (reference group = FAQ-unimpaired), pauses inside target circles classified other participants into their respective groups (p < 0.015, respectively). Factor analysis using six dTMT-B variables (oblique rotation) yielded a two-factor solution related to impaired motor/cognitive operations (48.96% variance explained) and faster more efficient motor/cognitive operations (28.88% variance explained).

Conclusion:

Digital assessment technology elegantly quantifies occult, nuanced behavior not previously appreciated, operationally defines critical underlying neurocognitive constructs related to functional abilities, and yields selected process-based scores that outperform traditional paper/pencil test scores for participant classification. When brought to scale, the dTMT-B test could be a sensitive tool to detect subtle-to-mild functional deficits in emergent neurodegenerative illnesses.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Front Neurol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Publication country: CH / SUIZA / SUÍÇA / SWITZERLAND

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Front Neurol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Publication country: CH / SUIZA / SUÍÇA / SWITZERLAND